Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | LAI Adam J. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 2 | KARAM Tariq A. | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 78% |
| 3 | SHI Andrew | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 3 | MORRILL Justin | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% |
| 5 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
| 5 | CHON Taylor A. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
| 7 | CHAN Matthew | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% |
| 8 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 34% |
| 9 | GEFELL Andrew P. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 10 | BARNETT Adam | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 11 | WONG Ryan | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | HO Kaden M. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 13 | MORRILL William | - | - | 5% | 27% | 46% | 21% |
| 13 | DENG Andrew | 3% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | QUAN Nicholas | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 16 | GHENEA George Philipe | 2% | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | HUANG Ethan F. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 18 | COLE Alexander | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 11% | - |
| 19 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 32% | 7% |
| 21 | GETS Matthew D. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 22 | CHEN Evan P. | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ZENG Noah | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 24 | YEN Preston | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 25 | FERRIS George H. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 25 | HUANG Tyler T. | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 27 | GHOSH Tuhin | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% |
| 27 | HONG Vincent Q. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 29 | KIM Matthew | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | CORTEZ Christopher | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 32 | YAO Jonathan | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 33 | ARROYO RIVERA JOSE M. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 34 | RAUSCHER Ryan | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | ZHOU Miles | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | KNISPEL-HEYWORTH Rafael | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 37 | PIWOWAR Alex | 6% | 35% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 38 | MATSUI Alen K. | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 39 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 40 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 41 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 42 | REYES Kyle | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | OVERDECK Andrew | 11% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 44 | JANG Junhyuk | 8% | 39% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 45 | OH Triton | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 46 | HAN Daniel Y. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 47 | LEE Aydan J. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | YUAN Kevin | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | PANDEY Neil | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 49 | GEORGE Daniel | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 51 | WU Yiyang | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 52 | KIM Shaun M. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 53 | HU Andrew | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 54 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 55 | LIU Yizhe | 31% | 49% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | LO Alexander | 4% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 57 | NG Jeremiah | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 58 | LEUNG Nathan | 35% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | YU Thomas | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 59 | YU Limin | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.