Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 2 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% | |
| 3 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
| 3 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
| 5 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | 2% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 6 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
| 7 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 8 | NI Sharon | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 9 | BOIS Adele | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 10 | DANK Dina | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 11 | XI Shining | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 12 | LEVITIS Danielle | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 13 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% | |
| 14 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 15 | JEAN Olympe G. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | LIN Selena | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | NEIBART Fiona | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
| 18 | CHU Catherine G. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 19 | YUAN Greta | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 20 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 2% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 21 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 22 | NATH Trisha | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | SHI Cathleen | - | 9% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 24 | CHANG Emily | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 25 | REN Xinling | 7% | 38% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | SPRINGER Ella | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | NGUYEN Ella | 3% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 28 | SHIH Christina | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 29 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 4% | |
| 30 | WANG Jianning | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | CHOWDHURY Ranlyn | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | PIOVANETTI Diana | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 35 | MORAN Rhea | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | JENKINS Scotland | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DAMDINSUREN Sophie | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | LIGH Karis | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.