Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 2 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
| 3 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
| 3 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 5 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 6 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | |
| 7 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
| 8 | NI Sharon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 9 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 10 | DANK Dina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 11 | XI Shining | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
| 12 | LEVITIS Danielle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
| 13 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% | |
| 14 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 15 | JEAN Olympe G. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | LIN Selena | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 18 | CHU Catherine G. | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 19 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
| 20 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 21 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 22 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 24 | CHANG Emily | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 25 | REN Xinling | 100% | 93% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | SPRINGER Ella | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 27 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 28 | SHIH Christina | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
| 30 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | CHOWDHURY Ranlyn | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | PIOVANETTI Diana | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 35 | MORAN Rhea | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DAMDINSUREN Sophie | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | LIGH Karis | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.