Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 2 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 3 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 3 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | - | - | - | 5% | 34% | 61% |
| 5 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 6 | PENG Bryan | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 7 | SIMAK Joseph P. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 8 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 10 | DENG Andrew | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 11 | PERRON Robert | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 12 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 13 | WANG Robert | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 14 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 15 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | SHTEIN Yan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 17 | STURN Oliver | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 18 | GINSBERG jordan | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 19 | LAU Justin Y. | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 20 | ZENG Noah | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 49% | 15% |
| 21 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 22 | FREDRICK Jameer | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | GOLD Carter | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 25 | KIM Shaun M. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 26 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 27 | LEONARD Charles | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | KANG evan | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 29 | ENGEL Peter | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | BAE Jason I. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 31 | ZHAO Lucas | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 32 | GONG Jerry | 2% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 34 | UH Daniel | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 35 | OH Aster | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | SUGIURA Samuel | 1% | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 37 | MORALES Jonathan | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | WEBER Mattias A. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 39 | BROU Inkosi | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 40 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | ANAND Sahil Z. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | OH Triton | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 43 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 44 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 45 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | RYAN Kai | 5% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | POSY Daniel | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | BERA Enzo | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 49 | PANDEY Neil | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | GUREVICH Savely | 9% | 40% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | CHENG Cody | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 52 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 53 | SAHAY Kenji | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 54 | GIORDANO Nicholas | 37% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | WANG Oscar | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 56 | LIGH Checed | 32% | 40% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | NGUYEN Anthony | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | LIN Philip T. | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 59 | SHELMIDINE Cole | 59% | 34% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | SINGER Marcus | 29% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | ALAVE Kyle | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 62 | WANG Max | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | CHANG Leo | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.