San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHIH Diane | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
2 | PANT Anisha | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
3 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 28% | |
3 | KOROL Neta | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
5 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
6 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
7 | ZHANG Eunice | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
8 | FUNG Emma | 1% | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
9 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
10 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
11 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
12 | UMAP Arna | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
13 | YIN Helen | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 7% |
14 | PATTERSON Natalia | 16% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
15 | KOROL Dana | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
16 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
17 | FUNG Vera | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
18 | MU Allison | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | < 1% | - | |
19 | WELBORN Calissa | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
20 | KO Claire | 23% | 49% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
21 | CHOI Kailyn | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
22 | XU Marie-Anne J. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
23 | KOSLOW Amicie | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
24 | WANG Zoie Z. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
25 | HOBSON Ava | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
26 | NICKOLOV Nora | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
27 | HSIUNG Samantha | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
28 | PENG Serena | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
29 | DAYAL Saahira | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
30 | LI Shuang | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
31 | FRANK Lauren | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
32 | LEE Samantha X. | 6% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
33 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
34 | CASTANEDA Keira | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
35 | WANG Celine S. | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
36 | MCKAY Teresa | 12% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
37 | DROGA Jezabel | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
38 | ZHENG Zoe | 23% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.