San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 2 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 3 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% | |
| 3 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% | |
| 5 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 6 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 7 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 8 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 10 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 11 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 12 | UMAP Arna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 13 | YIN Helen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 7% |
| 14 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
| 16 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 17 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 18 | MU Allison | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | < 1% | - | |
| 19 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 20 | KO Claire | 100% | 77% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 21 | CHOI Kailyn | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 22 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 23 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | |
| 24 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 25 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 27 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 28 | PENG Serena | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | DAYAL Saahira | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | LI Shuang | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 31 | FRANK Lauren | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 32 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 94% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% | |
| 34 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% | |
| 35 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | MCKAY Teresa | 100% | 88% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | DROGA Jezabel | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 77% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.