The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% | 
| 2 | COELHO Cristiano P. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | |
| 3 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% | 
| 3 | LUH Ethan K. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% | 
| 5 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 
| 5 | MA Bryant | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% | 
| 7 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | 
| 8 | WOO Christian | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
| 9 | SHEN Owen | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 37% | 9% | 
| 10 | SISINNI Riccardo | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | 
| 11 | DETERING Julian | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | 
| 12 | KANG Anthony | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 47% | 15% | 
| 13 | CO Dylan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 40% | 11% | 
| 14 | FINNEY Lorenz | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% | 
| 15 | LLIDO Soren | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | 
| 16 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 40% | 9% | |
| 17 | VALOUEV Aleksey | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | |
| 18 | LI Jett | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | 
| 19 | BAEK David | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% | 
| 20 | SMITH Grant D. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - | 
| 21 | TEH Ryan | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | 
| 21 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | 
| 23 | WU Lucas | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 36% | 11% | 1% | 
| 24 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 
| 25 | MA Andrew | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 10% | 
| 26 | ANDERSON Jacob | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 3% | 
| 27 | YU Leo | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | MYERS Dean | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% | 
| 29 | PARK Sky | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | 
| 30 | HARRIS Otto | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 
| 32 | SETLUR Bhrugu | 4% | 24% | 44% | 24% | 4% | - | - | 
| 33 | WANG Ethan | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% | 
| 34 | YEE Johnathan | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% | 
| 35 | CRACRAFT John R. | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | HUSSAIN Ibrahim | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 37 | FUKUDA Diego | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% | 
| 38 | FANG Jaden | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | 
| 39 | LAM Nicolas | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | LIU William | 3% | 21% | 45% | 26% | 6% | - | - | 
| 41 | HUSSAIN Ismail A. | 7% | 31% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | 
| 41 | EDISON Ansel | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - | 
| 43 | KIM Jonah | 24% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - | 
| 44 | WACHTEL Oliver | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | 
| 45 | ZWEIBACK Jacob | 10% | 30% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - | 
| 46 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | 
| 47 | CHUANG Kian J. | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 48 | BOUCHARD Kai | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 49 | REDDY Rohan | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - | 
| 50 | SEO Shawn | 5% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - | 
| 51 | PETERSON Lucas | 22% | 48% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - | 
| 52 | KHER Roan | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% | 
| 53 | TUAN Evan | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - | 
| 54 | AGRAWAL Niki | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - | 
| 55 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - | 
| 56 | RUBIN Max | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - | 
| 57 | REICHEL Ezra | 21% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 63% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - | 
| 59 | ALBINALI Eissa | 30% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - | 
| 59 | BECKER Ethan | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | 
| 61 | JIANG Yehong | 44% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | 
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.