The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 14% | |
| 2 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 3 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 31% | ||
| 3 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 5 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% |
| 6 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
| 7 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
| 8 | YIN Helen | 100% | 98% | 73% | 20% | 2% | ||
| 9 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 10 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 45% | ||
| 11 | CHENG Lydia A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 16% |
| 12 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 13 | WEBB Ella | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 14 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 15 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 16 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 18 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 20 | YEH Marissa E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 25% | 3% |
| 21 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 16% |
| 22 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 23 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 85% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% | |
| 25 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | CABALU Alaina | 100% | 99% | 74% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | MU Allison | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 29 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 97% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | PENG Serena | 100% | 89% | 36% | 5% | - | ||
| 35 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 29% | 2% | - | - | ||
| 36 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MCKAY Teresa | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.