The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 67% |
2 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
3 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
3 | PACHECO Naomi | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
5 | FELAND Alexandra | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
6 | CHANG Celine A. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
7 | PANT Anisha | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 44% | 20% | |
8 | ENRILE Erica | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
9 | HAU Olivia | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% | |
10 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% | |
11 | HABERMAN Hailey | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
12 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
13 | LEE Olivia | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
14 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
15 | DALEY Keira | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
16 | DUONG Zoey | 2% | 22% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | |
17 | LIN Ashley | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
18 | SINHA Zara | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 3% |
19 | CHA Eugenie | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
20 | LYU Jiaqi | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
21 | LI Charlotte | - | 3% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 5% | |
22 | TAN Jocelyn | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
23 | LOUIE Sarah | 4% | 29% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | |
24 | HSIU Elizabeth | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | - |
25 | YIN Grace | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 15% | |
26 | DAYAL Saahira | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
27 | LEE Samantha X. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
28 | HUANG Lanlan | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 1% |
29 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
30 | DERAKSHANDEH Donya | 2% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
31 | WANG Angelina | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
32 | POON Desiree | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
33 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
34 | SIVAGAR Fiona | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
35 | ESTRADA Ariana | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
36 | YIN Gabriela | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
37 | SI Amelia | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
38 | COHEN Shaina | 10% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
39 | XU Celina | 9% | 38% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | |
40 | WAGLE Vaishali | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
41 | MA Katelyn | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
42 | CHANG Abigail | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
43 | LIANG Jingjing | 25% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
44 | BHATT Anisha | 35% | 43% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
45 | ZOLNIKOV Alina | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
46 | CHEUNG Sharon | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.