Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 48% | 35% |
2 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
3 | LEE Hannah | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
3 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
5 | SZETO Chloe | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 16% |
6 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
7 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
8 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
9 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
10 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
11 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
11 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
13 | LIU Sophie | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
14 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
15 | CHIN Sophia J. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
16 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
17 | XU Ellen | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% |
18 | KIM Marley I. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
19 | YANG Angelina LeLe | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
20 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
21 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
22 | GHAYALOD reya | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
23 | HILD Nisha | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 16% |
24 | LU Amy | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
25 | BLUM Leah I. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
26 | DANK Dina | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
27 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
28 | LU Elaine | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
29 | SINHA Anika | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
30 | BUHAY Rachel T. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
31 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
32 | NATH Trisha | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | - |
33 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
34 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
35 | JUNG Irene | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
36 | JULIEN Michelle | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
37 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
38 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
39 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
40 | KER Grace | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
41 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
42 | YUAN Greta | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
43 | MCKEE Brynnley | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
44 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% |
45 | SHTREVENSKY Maria | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
46 | XIAO julie | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
47 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
48 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
49 | MAKLIN Sofia | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | - |
50 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
51 | LEE Sophia | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
52 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
53 | WEI Vivian W. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
54 | HENRY Soraya S. | 13% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
55 | TSUI Natalie | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
56 | NGUYEN Ella | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
57 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
58 | WU Helen | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
59 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
60 | CHEN Ashley | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
61 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
62 | DONG Angel | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
63 | GRAFF Sophie | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
64 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
65 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
66 | LIAO Siwen | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
67 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 1% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
68 | FAN Grace | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
69 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
70 | JEONG Katie | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
71 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
72 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
73 | ZHANG Chenfei | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
74 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
75 | PENG Florella | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
76 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 2% |
77 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
78 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
79 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
80 | CHEN Xinyan | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
81 | ZENG Megan | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
82 | CHANG Audrey | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
83 | HUNG Anna | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
84 | JOHNSON Lydia | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
85 | SADOVA Olga | 1% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
86 | JOHNSTON Lily | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
87 | YANG Lea | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
88 | SHI Julia | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
89 | KHAN Alissa | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
90 | CHIANG Emily | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
91 | LI Angela | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
92 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
93 | MANSPERGER Leena | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
94 | SO Catelyn | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
95 | BAWA Anahat | 38% | 41% | 17% | 4% | - | - | |
96 | SPRINGER Ella | 3% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
97 | EVANS Madelynn | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
98 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
99 | WANG Jianning | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
100 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
101 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
102 | JENKINS Scotland | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
103 | COLBY Mercer | 42% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
104 | HE Lizbeth | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
105 | MORAN Rhea | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
106 | WEI JoyAnn | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
106 | LO JOCELYN | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
108 | MCKEE Ainsley | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
109 | SHUM Cindy | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
109 | NEELEY Leilani | 79% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
109 | FANG sophie | 24% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
109 | KUANG TongFei | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
113 | HUANG MADELINE | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
114 | YU Zhiang | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
115 | KOKAL Genevieve | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
115 | SCHICK Veronica | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.