Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 35% |
| 2 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% |
| 3 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
| 3 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% |
| 5 | SZETO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 6 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 7 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 8 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 9 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% |
| 10 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 11 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
| 11 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 13 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 14 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 15 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 16 | CHEN Xiaohan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 16% | |
| 17 | XU Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 18% |
| 18 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
| 19 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 20 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 21 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 23 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 24 | LU Amy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 25 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 26 | DANK Dina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 27 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 28 | LU Elaine | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 29 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 31 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 33 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 34 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 35 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 36 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 37 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 38 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 39 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 40 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 41 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
| 42 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 43 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 45 | SHTREVENSKY Maria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 46 | XIAO julie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 47 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
| 48 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 49 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 50 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 51 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 52 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
| 54 | HENRY Soraya S. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 56 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 57 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 58 | WU Helen | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 59 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 60 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 61 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 62 | DONG Angel | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 63 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 64 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 65 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 66 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 67 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 99% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 68 | FAN Grace | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 69 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 70 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 71 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 72 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 73 | ZHANG Chenfei | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 74 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 75 | PENG Florella | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 76 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 77 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 78 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 79 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 80 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 81 | ZENG Megan | 100% | 91% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 82 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 83 | HUNG Anna | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 84 | JOHNSON Lydia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 85 | SADOVA Olga | 100% | 99% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 86 | JOHNSTON Lily | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 87 | YANG Lea | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 88 | SHI Julia | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 89 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 90 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 91 | LI Angela | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 92 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 93 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 94 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 95 | BAWA Anahat | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 96 | SPRINGER Ella | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 97 | EVANS Madelynn | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 98 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 99 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 100 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 101 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 102 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 103 | COLBY Mercer | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 104 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 105 | MORAN Rhea | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 106 | LO JOCELYN | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 108 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 109 | SHUM Cindy | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 109 | NEELEY Leilani | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 109 | FANG sophie | 100% | 76% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | KUANG TongFei | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 113 | HUANG MADELINE | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 114 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 115 | KOKAL Genevieve | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 115 | SCHICK Veronica | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.