Metuchen, NJ - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% |
2 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
3 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
3 | IDRISSI Idris | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
5 | TANG Shu Hon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
6 | SANTOS Theodore | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | 1% |
7 | LEE Matthew | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
8 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
9 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
10 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 5% |
11 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - |
12 | RAJMOHAN Arya | 100% | 93% | 59% | 17% | 1% | |
13 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | 1% |
14 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
15 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 12% | |
16 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
17 | KIETLINSKI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
18 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
19 | RONG Jasper | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
20 | CHANG Leo | 100% | 95% | 61% | 19% | 2% | |
21 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
22 | HERDA Tiger | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - |
23 | GONZALEZ Kal-El | 100% | 84% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
24 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
25 | SARWAHI Viraat | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 1% |
25 | MENDOZA Diwa | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
27 | DOCIL Jack | 100% | 96% | 71% | 27% | 4% | - |
28 | MCDONALD Finn | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
29 | DEELY Hartigan | 100% | 88% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
30 | LASKOW Max | 100% | 89% | 50% | 14% | 1% | - |
31 | KENNEDY Tomás | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
32 | PETRE Tudor | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
33 | DE SIENA Salvatore | 100% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
34 | BALE ATMAN | 100% | 44% | 8% | - | - | |
35 | GOMEZ Emilio | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.