Houston, TX - Houston, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BRATTON Jack S. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 2 | DICKSON Farr R. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 3 | GRIFFIN John O. | - | - | 1% | 15% | 50% | 34% |
| 3 | IYOKI Kent | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 30% |
| 5 | NEWHARD Noah A. | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 15% | |
| 6 | SHIBU Pranav | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 50% | 14% |
| 7 | QUINONES Diego A. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 8 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | 7% | 30% | 43% | 20% |
| 9 | CLARK Edward P. | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 10 | SCHOENBERGER Xander S. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 11 | CHEN Felix | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 12 | YANG Andrew | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 13 | HAMMEL Blaine W. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 14 | NEWELL Ian A. | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 15 | SONG Dylan S. | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 16 | DESHMUKH Ayush | 7% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 17 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | STONE Henry J. | 2% | 21% | 45% | 28% | 3% | - |
| 19 | KLEPKO Gleb | - | 13% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | FINLEY Dylan | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 21 | GUO Zachary | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 22 | BATANG Cergio Manuel A. | 7% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 23 | WOODALL Ian L. | 5% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 24 | CUMMING Thomas | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | PIERCE Logan | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | KUO Evan | 64% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 27 | MURPHY IV James F. | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | PRASANNA Advaith | 18% | 48% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | GEALY Jett | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.