King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JING Emily | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
| 2 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
| 3 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
| 3 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% | |
| 5 | KOO Rachel A. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 6 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
| 7 | KIM Rachael | - | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 8 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 9 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 10 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% |
| 11 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
| 12 | EYER Hailey M. | - | 1% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | APELIAN Katherine | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 14 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
| 15 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 16 | HE Fenghuan | - | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 17 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% | |
| 18 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 3% | 28% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 19 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
| 20 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 21 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | |
| 22 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 38% | 36% | 10% |
| 23 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 24 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 25 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | LEE Bethany W. | - | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 27 | OH Erin H. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 28 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 29 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 30 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 31 | JANG Kimberley | - | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 1% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
| 34 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 2% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | HECKMANN Emma | - | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 36 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% |
| 36 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 38 | YE Eileen | - | - | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 39 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 40 | MILLER Naomi E. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 41 | DU Hannah | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | LEE Lavender | - | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | XUE Alanna | - | 3% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 4% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | LI Meilin | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% |
| 46 | YU Lauren C. | 1% | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 47 | WU Irene M. | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 48 | PERLMAN Talia | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 49 | SHEN Lydia | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 50 | PAVE Claire | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 51 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 52 | MEI Sarah | 20% | 54% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 54 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | - | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 55 | MI Anning | 7% | 59% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | ZHOU Catherine | 26% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | KOSLOW Amicie | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 58 | CHARALEL Jessica | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 59 | WONG Sophia M. | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 60 | SEO IRENE Y. | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 60 | GU Emily | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 62 | ROY Layla | 1% | 11% | 41% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 63 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 27% | 50% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 63% | 34% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | CHEN Jasmine | 13% | 43% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 66 | XIANG Emma | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 67 | SU Michelle | 15% | 41% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 68 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 32% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 69 | LEE Kaitlyn | 44% | 51% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 70 | PAULUS Isabella | 25% | 59% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | ORVANANOS Anice | 8% | 40% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | MI Aileen | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 73 | LENZ Zoe N. | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 74 | SHTROM Uma A. | 61% | 36% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 58% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | PARK Leah | 87% | 13% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 77 | OETZEL Taylor | 46% | 49% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 78 | SUSINO Gabriella | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 79 | HOWELL Jocelyn | 23% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.