King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JING Emily | V V V V V D | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 2 | LUNG Katerina | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 3 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | CHEN Jia P. | V D V V D | V V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 5 | KOO Rachel A. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 6 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 7 | KIM Rachael | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 8 | SADAN Jordan E. | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 9 | ZHENG Ivy | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 10 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 11 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 12 | EYER Hailey M. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 13 | APELIAN Katherine | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 14 | PEVZNER Victoria | V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 15 | SHAW Kayla M. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 16 | HE Fenghuan | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 17 | ZHANG Alina C. | V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 18 | HUANG NATALIE | V V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 19 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 20 | CHEN Allison V. | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 21 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | V V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 22 | SOOD Ishani S. | V V V D D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 23 | LEE Brianna J. | V D V V V D | V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
| 24 | DAVIA Daniella V. | D V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 25 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | D D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 26 | LEE Bethany W. | V D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 27 | OH Erin H. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 28 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 29 | KHOO Lauren A. | V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 30 | SHEN Sophia H. | V D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 31 | JANG Kimberley | V D V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 32 | CHO Cameron S. | D D D V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 33 | HO Brianna W. | V V V V D V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 34 | CHO Rebecca H. | D V V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 35 | HECKMANN Emma | V D V V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 36 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | V V D V V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 36 | SARTORI Taylor M. | V V V D V D | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 38 | YE Eileen | V V V D D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 39 | ACHILOVA Feyza | D D V V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 40 | MILLER Naomi E. | D V D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 41 | DU Hannah | D V V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 42 | LEE Lavender | D V V D D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 43 | XUE Alanna | V D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 44 | LOCKE Savannah | V V D V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 44 | LI Meilin | D V D V D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 46 | YU Lauren C. | V D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 47 | WU Irene M. | V D V D D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 48 | PERLMAN Talia | D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 49 | SHEN Lydia | D D D V V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 50 | PAVE Claire | V D V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 51 | ZHAO Sophie L. | D V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 52 | MEI Sarah | D D D D V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 53 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | D V D D D V | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 54 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | D D D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 55 | MI Anning | D D D V D V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 56 | ZHOU Catherine | D V V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 57 | KOSLOW Amicie | D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 58 | CHARALEL Jessica | D V D D D | V D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 59 | WONG Sophia M. | D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 60 | SEO IRENE Y. | D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 60 | GU Emily | D D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 62 | ROY Layla | D D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 63 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | D D D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 64 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | D D D D D D | V D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 65 | CHEN Jasmine | D D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 66 | XIANG Emma | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 67 | SU Michelle | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 68 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 69 | LEE Kaitlyn | D D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 70 | PAULUS Isabella | V D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 71 | ORVANANOS Anice | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 71 | MI Aileen | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 73 | LENZ Zoe N. | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 74 | SHTROM Uma A. | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 75 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 75 | PARK Leah | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 77 | OETZEL Taylor | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 78 | SUSINO Gabriella | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 79 | HOWELL Jocelyn | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.