King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 38% | |
| 2 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% | |
| 3 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 53% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 5 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | |
| 6 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 36% | |
| 7 | KIM Diane E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 39% | |
| 8 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 90% | 50% | 12% | 1% | |
| 9 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% |
| 10 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% | 4% |
| 11 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 92% | 50% | 10% | |
| 12 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 64% | 16% | |
| 13 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 33% | |
| 13 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 97% | 47% | 9% | - | |
| 15 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 23% | |
| 16 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 17 | LIU Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
| 18 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | |
| 19 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 20 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 41% | |
| 21 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
| 22 | MAO Amy | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
| 23 | GAO Judy | 100% | 97% | 71% | 28% | 4% | |
| 24 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
| 25 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 17% | |
| 26 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 93% | 61% | 18% | 2% | |
| 27 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 23% | 2% | |
| 28 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 91% | 54% | 13% | 1% | |
| 29 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 97% | 72% | 29% | 5% | |
| 30 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | FENG ge | 100% | 87% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 14% | |
| 33 | GABERKORN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 24% | |
| 34 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 92% | 56% | 17% | 2% | |
| 35 | YANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 83% | 35% | 5% | |
| 36 | FAZZINI Angelina | 100% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 36 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 83% | 40% | 7% | - | |
| 38 | MAMEDOVA Farah | 100% | 44% | 7% | - | - | |
| 39 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 5% |
| 40 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 41 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 80% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 41 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | 100% | 97% | 73% | 32% | 5% | |
| 43 | LI Alisha | 100% | 82% | 30% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 90% | 27% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | LAMBERT Camille L. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 12% | |
| 47 | BANKULLA Misha R. | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | |
| 48 | RAI Ananya | 100% | 76% | 30% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | KANEVSKY Samantha | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 96% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 52 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 79% | 33% | 5% | - | |
| 53 | EDELSTEIN Julie | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | GOGINENI Gamana | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | |
| 55 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 56 | JAY Elena | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.