King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOO Rachel A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 2 | JING Emily | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 3 | ZHENG Vivian | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 3 | LUNG Katerina | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 5 | WANG Ellen | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 6 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
| 7 | KOKES Gabrielle | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 8 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 9 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 43% | 14% |
| 10 | HOSONO Rei W. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 11 | APELIAN Katherine | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 12 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 13 | HECKMANN Emma | - | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 14 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | - | 13% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 17 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% |
| 18 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 19 | CHEN Jia P. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 14% | |
| 20 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
| 21 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | LEE Allison (Allie) | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 23 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
| 24 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 25 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 26 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 27 | XUE Alanna | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | LEE Brianna J. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 29 | SADAN Jordan E. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 30 | PERLMAN Talia | - | 1% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | OH Erin H. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | |
| 33 | KIM Rachael | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 34 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 35 | LI Meilin | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | |
| 36 | CHO Taylor S. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 37 | LEE Bethany W. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 40 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
| 41 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 42 | HUANG NATALIE | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 43 | LOCKE Savannah | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | SHEN Lydia | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 47 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 48 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 49 | YU Lauren C. | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | DU Hannah | 4% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 51 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 53 | ACHILOVA Feyza | - | 6% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 54 | CHEN Georgia M. | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | WONG Sophia M. | 2% | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | WU Irene M. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
| 57 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 58 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 59 | SU Michelle | 17% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | PAVE Claire | 5% | 58% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | GU Emily | 2% | 37% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | XIANG Emma | 12% | 44% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | MI Anning | 34% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 64 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 65 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 5% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 66 | LENZ Zoe N. | 20% | 54% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 67 | MEYER Claudia | 58% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 68 | CHARALEL Jessica | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 68 | OETZEL Taylor | 62% | 35% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 70 | CHEN Jasmine | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | ZHOU Catherine | 24% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 72 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 73 | MEI Sarah | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | SUSINO Gabriella | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.