King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOO Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 2 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
| 3 | ZHENG Vivian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 3 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
| 5 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 6 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 46% |
| 7 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 8 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
| 9 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 14% |
| 10 | HOSONO Rei W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 11 | APELIAN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 12 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
| 13 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | 100% | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | |
| 17 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 18 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 19 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 20 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% | |
| 21 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 22 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 23 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
| 24 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 25 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 26 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% |
| 27 | XUE Alanna | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
| 29 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
| 30 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | OH Erin H. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | |
| 33 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 34 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 35 | LI Meilin | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | |
| 36 | CHO Taylor S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 37 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 39 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 40 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 41 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
| 42 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 43 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 47 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 48 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% | |
| 49 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | DU Hannah | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 51 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% |
| 53 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 54 | CHEN Georgia M. | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 98% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 57 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
| 58 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 59 | SU Michelle | 100% | 83% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 95% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | GU Emily | 100% | 98% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 88% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | MI Anning | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 64 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 65 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 66 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 80% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 67 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 68 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 68 | OETZEL Taylor | 100% | 38% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 70 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | ZHOU Catherine | 100% | 76% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 72 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 73 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | SUSINO Gabriella | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.