The Southern RYC/RJCC/ROC (VET/D1A/DV2/TEAM)

Junior Men’s Saber (JNRMS)

Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Register

John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2599 2840 - 2496
5 - 8 2311 2440 - 2205
9 - 16 2080 2247 - 1957
17 - 25 1829 1934 - 1651

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Chaves, Matthew Forge Fencing Teams B22 2840 2582.04
2 So, Preston Nellya Fencers D23 2551 2296.60
3 Deck, Tyson Forge Fencing Teams C23 2496 2239.92
4 DuPree, Thomas Florida Fencing Academy C23 2510 2211.91
5 May, Griffin Nellya Fencers C23 2440 2175.48
6 MAHAPATRA, SAMARTH Nellya Fencers C23 2340 2054.25
7 Yadav, Lakshya Unattached E23 2258 1961.93
8 Gauvey, Kieran DC Fencers Club E23 2205 1924.95
9 Hall, Noah Triple Threat Fencing Academy C23 2113 1850.84
10 Harrington, Connor Alle Fencing Club D23 2139 1824.86
11 Xie, Joshua Athens Fencing Club D23 2247 1790.88
12 Crain, Bennett Forge Fencing Teams E23 2075 1777.77
13 Feng, Brendan Miracle Fencing Club E23 2040 1775.94
14 Sun, Ziyao Forge Fencing Teams D23 2083 1766.45
15 Sokolov, Arseniy Alle Fencing Club U 1986 1628.03
16 Montalvo, Emmeric Alpha Fencing Academy E22 1957 1599.92
17 Bialik, Noah Triple Threat Fencing Academy E23 1931 1556.32
18 Slep, Solomon Forge Fencing Teams E23 1934 1543.60
19 Benson, Jacob Nova Fencing Club E23 1895 1535.30
20 Parcell, Colby Miracle Fencing Club U 1851 1528.31
21 Markowitz, Jonathan Nova Fencing Club E23 1852 1499.32
22 Eyster, Edison Forge Fencing Teams U 1904 1490.88
23 Fruth, Evan Forge Fencing Teams E23 1770 1431.38
24 Montalvo, ashur Alpha Fencing Academy U 1677 1245.27
25 Lopez, Lincoln Florida Fencing Academy U 1651 881.40

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!