Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 58% |
2 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 11% | |
3 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
3 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | |
5 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | |
6 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% | |
7 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
8 | GULCHIN Mark | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
9 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | |
10 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
11 | FOGELSON Hugh | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
12 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
13 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 20% | 2% |
14 | HONG Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
15 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Muhammad | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
16 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
17 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 11% |
18 | MARTIN Darius | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | 16% | |
19 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
20 | O'LEARY Colin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 1% | |
21 | JIANG Oscar | 100% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
22 | MO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
23 | GOLDYUK Steven | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - |
24 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
25 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
26 | WEI JR Shan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
27 | ZHANG ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 7% | |
28 | BOBROW Silas | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% | |
29 | TANG Royce | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
30 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
31 | UNGERER Henry | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
32 | TANG Terry | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
33 | YEVDAYEV Tamir | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
34 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
35 | BLACK Henry | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
36 | SICAT Justin | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
37 | ANTE Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 28% | 3% | |
38 | REN Ryan | 100% | 87% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
39 | SHAW eric | 100% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
40 | COSSROW Alex | 100% | 59% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
41 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
42 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
43 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
44 | KRZYWON Dylan | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.