Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 34% |
| 2 | JANG Kimberley | - | - | 1% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 10% |
| 3 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% |
| 3 | KOO Rachel A. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 47% | 38% |
| 5 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% | |
| 6 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
| 7 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
| 8 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 18% | |
| 9 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 10 | YU Lauren C. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 42% | 14% | 1% |
| 11 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 5% |
| 12 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% |
| 13 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 49% | 32% |
| 14 | YE Eileen | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | SEO IRENE Y. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
| 16 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% |
| 17 | MASSICK Laine | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
| 18 | MEI Sarah | 7% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 2% | 21% | 44% | 28% | 5% |
| 20 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | - | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 21% |
| 21 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | GU Emily | - | 7% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 23 | WU Renee | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | CHOW Annabelle | 1% | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LEE Alison | 6% | 32% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 6% | 31% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | UNGERER Frieda | 38% | 46% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 28 | CHARALEL Jessica | 9% | 37% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | ORVANANOS Anice | 2% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | YANG Lingting | 8% | 36% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 6% | 41% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | NEUMAN Sophie | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | 7% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 34 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 3% | 32% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | MEYER Claudia | 21% | 48% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 36 | PAVE Claire | 2% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | YANIV Liya | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | SCARLETT Skye | 40% | 46% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | CHEN Jasmine | 24% | 49% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | WEI Angela | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | HOWELL Jocelyn | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.