Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | FANG Sabrina | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 2 | JANG Kimberley | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | DAVIA Daniella V. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | KOO Rachel A. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 5 | PEVZNER Victoria | V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 6 | HO Brianna W. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 7 | CHUSID Mikayla | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 8 | ZHANG Alina C. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 9 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | D V V V V D | V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
| 10 | YU Lauren C. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 11 | CHEN Allison V. | V D V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 12 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 13 | CHEN Jia P. | D V V V V D | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 14 | YE Eileen | V V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 15 | SEO IRENE Y. | D D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 16 | SHAW Kayla M. | V D V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 17 | MASSICK Laine | D V D V V V | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 18 | MEI Sarah | D V V D V V | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 19 | EYER Hailey M. | V V D V V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 20 | SERBAN Samantha M. | D D V V V V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 21 | CHO Rebecca H. | V V V D D D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 22 | GU Emily | V V D D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | WU Renee | V D V V D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 24 | CHOW Annabelle | V V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 25 | LEE Alison | V V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 26 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | D D D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | UNGERER Frieda | V V D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 28 | CHARALEL Jessica | V D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 29 | ORVANANOS Anice | D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 30 | YANG Lingting | D D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | MARKOVSKY Nina | D D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 32 | NEUMAN Sophie | V D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 33 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | D D V D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 34 | SLASKI Caroline O. | D D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 35 | MEYER Claudia | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 36 | PAVE Claire | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 37 | YANIV Liya | D D D D D V | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 38 | SCARLETT Skye | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 39 | CHEN Jasmine | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 40 | WEI Angela | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 41 | HOWELL Jocelyn | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.