San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Olivia | - | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 35% | 17% |
| 2 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 3 | LIN Ariel | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 3 | WANG Ziqi | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 5% |
| 5 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 61% | |
| 6 | LEE Camilla | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 7 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 8 | MOLLINIER Anais | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 9 | LIANG Jingjing | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 10 | WANG Angelina | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 42% | 9% | |
| 11 | WAGLE Vaishali | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
| 12 | ENRILE Erica | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | |
| 13 | CHANG Abigail | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 14 | HSIU Elizabeth | 1% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | WANG Victoria | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 16 | DAYAL Saahira | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 17 | KWON Genevie | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | CHUNG Penelope | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 28% | 4% | |
| 19 | BLANCO Ariia | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | TUMANYAN Victoria | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | SALISTRA Emilia | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 6% |
| 22 | WANG Jessie | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 23 | XU Celina | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | GUO Luxi | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | |
| 25 | BHATT Anisha | 13% | 40% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | LAI Amanda | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 27 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
| 27 | BENNETT Vienne | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | COHEN Shaina | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 30 | CHEN Samantha | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | KANDALA Aanya | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LEE Megan | 7% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 33 | YIN Gabriela | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | MYERS Cal | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 35 | MA Ashley | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 36 | SCHOR Madeleine | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 37 | MATHEW Noe | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | JAMES Ashley | 31% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | SIMHADRI Sanjana | 30% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | NAZARENKO Sasha | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.