San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 53% | 17% |
| 2 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 3 | LIN Ariel | 100% | 94% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 3 | WANG Ziqi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 5% |
| 5 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |
| 6 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 7 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 8 | MOLLINIER Anais | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 9 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 10 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 9% | |
| 11 | WAGLE Vaishali | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 12 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% | |
| 13 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 14 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 16 | DAYAL Saahira | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 17 | KWON Genevie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | CHUNG Penelope | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | 4% | |
| 19 | BLANCO Ariia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | TUMANYAN Victoria | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | SALISTRA Emilia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 22 | WANG Jessie | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 23 | XU Celina | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | GUO Luxi | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 25 | BHATT Anisha | 100% | 87% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 99% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 27 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 27 | BENNETT Vienne | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | COHEN Shaina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 30 | CHEN Samantha | 100% | 86% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | KANDALA Aanya | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LEE Megan | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | YIN Gabriela | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | MYERS Cal | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 35 | MA Ashley | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | SCHOR Madeleine | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 37 | MATHEW Noe | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 38 | JAMES Ashley | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | SIMHADRI Sanjana | 100% | 70% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | NAZARENKO Sasha | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.