San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% |
| 2 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 3 | CHOI Kailyn | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 3 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 5 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 6 | VO Bao-Vy | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 7 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 8 | SUN Chloe | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 9 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 11 | KO Claire | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | RAO Sonia D. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 13 | BOLES Amanda X. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 14 | HO Addison | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | PENG Serena | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 16 | SWANSON Alexa | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | LUH Mia P. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 18 | FUNG Vera | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 19 | KIM Rachel | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 20 | OH Ceana | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 21 | HOBSON Ava | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 22 | MU Allison | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | YANG Audrey | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 31% |
| 26 | PENG Charlotte | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | WANG Celine S. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 28 | FUNG Emma | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 29 | ZHENG Zoe | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 29 | CUI Alivia | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | HSU Kaylin | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 32 | SAIFEE Lamya | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | YUEN Elsie | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 34 | REN Kayley | 7% | 35% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | DENG Melissa | 10% | 44% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | KHAIRUL ANWAR Rania Zara | 27% | 48% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | ZHANG Ivy | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | LIN Phoebe | 7% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | MCKAY Teresa | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | EBERHART Ava | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | MONAT Jennifer | 7% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.