San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
2 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
3 | CHOI Kailyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
3 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
5 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
6 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
7 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
8 | SUN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
9 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
10 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
11 | KO Claire | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
12 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
13 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
14 | HO Addison | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
15 | PENG Serena | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
16 | SWANSON Alexa | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
17 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
18 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
19 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
20 | OH Ceana | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
21 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
22 | MU Allison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
23 | YANG Audrey | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
24 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
25 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
26 | PENG Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
27 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
28 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
29 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
29 | CUI Alivia | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
31 | HSU Kaylin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
32 | SAIFEE Lamya | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
33 | YUEN Elsie | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
34 | REN Kayley | 100% | 93% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
35 | DENG Melissa | 100% | 90% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
36 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
37 | KHAIRUL ANWAR Rania Zara | 100% | 73% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
38 | ZHANG Ivy | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
39 | LIN Phoebe | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
40 | MCKAY Teresa | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
41 | EBERHART Ava | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
41 | MONAT Jennifer | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.