Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
2 | WANG Karen | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
3 | KHROL Caralina | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 38% |
3 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
5 | DING Jiahe (Heidi) | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
6 | KETKAR Ketki | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 40% |
7 | WANG Elizabeth | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
8 | ROBLES Elena | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
9 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
10 | PATURU Meghana | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
11 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 33% |
12 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
13 | CHAN Elizabeth | 1% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
14 | ZHU Heidi | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
15 | GANDHI Sedna S. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 41% | 15% |
16 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
17 | WATRALL Christina | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
18 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 43% |
19 | DANIEL Olivia | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
20 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
21 | TYLER Syd | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
22 | GABERKORN Nadia | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
23 | WU Amelia | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
24 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
25 | ZHENG Ava | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
26 | KETKAR Mallika | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
27 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
28 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
29 | GU Sarah | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
30 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
31 | MCLANE Lauren | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
32 | CHEUNG Ho Huen | 7% | 37% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
33 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
34 | LU Shiqi | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
35 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
36 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
37 | OGAWA Kaylin | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
38 | LEUNG Natalie | 1% | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
39 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
40 | MILLETTE Marie Frederique | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
41 | AHUJA Arianna | 1% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
42 | XU Grace (XinYi) | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
43 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
44 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
45 | REID Sobia | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
46 | LEE Sumin | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 3% |
47 | WANG Nora | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
48 | BURN Lauren M. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
49 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
50 | KIM Diane E. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
51 | LIU Christina A. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
52 | SUN Angelica | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
53 | LIN Katie Y. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
54 | WANG anne | 2% | 17% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
55 | CHAN Cheri K. | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
56 | REID Anousheh | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - |
57 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
58 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
59 | XING Carol | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - |
60 | SMITH Grace L. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
61 | CHIN Isabella | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
62 | BARRETT Elisabeth | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
63 | SMUK Daria A. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
64 | GALLON Maya S. | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
65 | KIM Erika S. | 45% | 44% | 10% | 1% | < 1% | - | |
66 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
67 | LOWENSTEIN Penelope J. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
68 | LIN Waiyuk | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
69 | MUCSI Angela Lilla | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | |
70 | NING Emma | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
71 | HU Grace | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
72 | LUO Ashley | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
73 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 19% |
74 | SEMIKIN Julia | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 3% |
75 | MOSKOFF Tessa | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
76 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
76 | SHEN Stephanie | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
78 | BUCUR Naomi | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
79 | SHUM Jessica | 23% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
80 | ELLENT Isabella S. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
81 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
82 | JIN Jasmine | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
83 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
84 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
85 | WU Fan | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
86 | ZHANG Tina | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
87 | SON Katherine (Injee) | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
88 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
89 | ANDERSON Nora E. | 7% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
90 | LI Bingqi | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
91 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 5% |
92 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
93 | PARTE Isabella B. | 19% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
94 | SAAL Anna | 9% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
95 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
96 | DUAN Jenny S. | 27% | 45% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
97 | GORNOVSKY Abigail | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
97 | KIM Annabelle | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
99 | GLICK Nina | 9% | 42% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
100 | PADHYE Tanishka | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
101 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 6% | 40% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
102 | YU Nicole J. | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
103 | SINHA Zara | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
104 | SU Vera | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
105 | QURESHI Nisa | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
106 | RUNIONS Emersyn | < 1% | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
107 | PALMER Amelia C. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
108 | HAMILTON Nina M. | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
109 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
110 | YU Bailey | 33% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
111 | TERRELL Gabriella | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
112 | MACEDON Gianna | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
112 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 37% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
114 | ZHENG Linden | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
116 | DILLE Carolina G. | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
117 | LEWIS Frances Morgan | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.