November NAC

Cadet Men's Foil

Monday, November 12, 2018 at 8:00 AM

Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 COLON Cesar L. - - 1% 8% 28% 42% 21%
2 LI Brandon H. - - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
3 BAE Anthony - - - 4% 20% 43% 32%
3 REID Clayton J. - - 2% 12% 30% 37% 18%
5 GRIFFIN John O. - - - 3% 18% 44% 35%
6 POON Simon - - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
7 YU Eric W. - - - - 4% 26% 69%
8 DONG Darren - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 22%
9 EMMER Chase T. - - - - 4% 26% 69%
9 PAIK Hyun K. - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
11 LIAO Jun Heng (James) - - - - 3% 24% 73%
12 AYUPOV Ilya - - - - 1% 11% 89%
13 LOUIE Bryce - - - 2% 11% 37% 50%
14 CHEN Ziyuan - - 4% 21% 39% 29% 7%
15 NDIAYE Edriss G. - - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
16 KIM Nicholas W. - 1% 8% 25% 38% 23% 4%
17 ZHANG Daniel D. - - 1% 8% 29% 42% 20%
18 SHAFAIE Kaveh - - - 1% 10% 38% 50%
19 SONG Lawrence (Larry) - 1% 5% 21% 42% 32%
20 HODGES Carter F. - - - - 3% 26% 71%
20 MCGILLION-MOORE Jake - - 4% 23% 41% 26% 5%
22 LI Brian H. - - 1% 6% 23% 41% 28%
23 LUTAR Lucas N. - - 1% 8% 26% 40% 24%
24 CHUNG Andrew N. - - - 5% 21% 42% 32%
25 MARTINEZ Donavyn E. - - 2% 9% 27% 40% 23%
25 LIU Justin - - - 1% 11% 44% 44%
27 DING Andrew Y. - - 2% 11% 33% 42% 14%
28 CHEN James P. - - - - 3% 27% 70%
29 NAGIMOV Marsel - - 4% 19% 37% 31% 9%
30 LIU Patrick - - 1% 6% 23% 41% 29%
31 WU Alexander 1% 8% 28% 37% 20% 5% -
32 BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. - - < 1% 5% 24% 49% 22%
33 PRILUTSKY David B. - - - 1% 13% 52% 34%
34 WONG Wesley C. - 5% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1%
35 DICKSON Farr R. - - 1% 9% 29% 41% 20%
36 LIU Niles J. - - - 3% 18% 43% 36%
37 DIVITO Dylan - - 6% 26% 41% 23% 3%
38 YANG Andy H. - - 2% 9% 28% 40% 21%
38 PAEK Alex J. - 5% 19% 34% 29% 11% 2%
40 CHUNG Jinwoo - 1% 10% 30% 39% 18% 2%
40 SULLIVAN Jackson R. - 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 4%
42 HASHIMOTO Shoei - - 2% 14% 35% 37% 13%
43 KELLY William J. - 1% 7% 24% 37% 26% 6%
45 ZHAO Jason L. - - 5% 28% 49% 17% 1%
46 XIAO Enoch A. 3% 16% 34% 32% 14% 2%
46 XIAO Leon (Ruibo) - 3% 18% 40% 32% 7%
48 DAYTON Draper - - 3% 16% 35% 33% 12%
49 OURSLER Jack - - - 1% 13% 46% 40%
50 SINGS Lucas A. 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 6% 1%
51 BRATTON Jack S. - 1% 8% 25% 39% 24% 3%
52 MCCLAIN Bryce C. - 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
53 LEVY Jacob M. - - 5% 19% 36% 30% 9%
54 YU Vinni - 5% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1%
54 DESERANNO Jeidus - 1% 12% 34% 37% 14% 1%
56 CHOY Lucas B. - 5% 18% 33% 29% 12% 2%
57 THAI William 2% 20% 39% 28% 9% 1% -
58 KIM Tei D. - 1% 7% 25% 39% 25% 3%
59 GRIFFITH JACK 4% 27% 38% 23% 7% 1% -
60 GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. - 1% 6% 22% 39% 27% 5%
61 UM Ethan A. - 1% 9% 25% 36% 24% 5%
62 JIMENEZ Diran - - 1% 8% 32% 49% 10%
63 KASI Sanjay - 6% 24% 38% 24% 6% 1%
64 CHOUN Minwook (Sam) - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6%
66 TULYAG Fyze A. - - 1% 6% 26% 45% 22%
67 YANG Adam - 2% 9% 26% 35% 23% 5%
68 SOHN Christopher - 1% 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
69 ANDREWS Nathan J. - 2% 12% 32% 37% 16% 1%
69 HONG Daniel - 1% 9% 26% 38% 24% 3%
71 HOLLAND Niklas - 4% 17% 35% 32% 12% 1%
72 HU Oliver W. - - - 2% 14% 41% 42%
73 DORITY Philip S. - - - 2% 11% 38% 49%
74 PELOSKY Ryan F. - - 2% 12% 34% 41% 11%
75 SUN Michael 9% 28% 34% 21% 7% 1% -
76 GRISWOLD Abel B. 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
77 WU Nicholas 1% 11% 33% 36% 16% 3% -
78 HAMILTON Bogdan A. - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
79 MA Alexander - 2% 10% 25% 35% 23% 6%
80 LIU Kevin B. - 3% 19% 40% 31% 6% -
82 TSANG Matthew K. 2% 13% 30% 33% 17% 4% -
83 LIN Richard W. - 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 4%
84 ROMANOV Michael 1% 6% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1%
85 CHOI Ethan L. - 4% 19% 37% 31% 9% 1%
86 DING Jonathan 2% 12% 32% 33% 17% 4% -
87 LIMA Kevin M. 1% 5% 18% 32% 30% 13% 2%
88 LEE Chris - 6% 23% 39% 25% 6% -
89 BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. 1% 8% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
90 NOVACHENKO Nestor V. - 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
90 POON Alvin - - 1% 8% 28% 42% 21%
90 AUGUSTINE Ethan A. - 2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2%
93 KUMBLA Samarth - - 1% 6% 26% 44% 24%
94 ANDERSON Colton J. 1% 9% 25% 34% 23% 7% 1%
95 XIAO Ethan J. - 1% 7% 28% 42% 21% 2%
96 VOGLER Justin K. - - 3% 13% 32% 37% 16%
97 HOOSHI Dylan M. - - 2% 14% 41% 38% 5%
98 XU Max - 1% 8% 31% 39% 19% 3%
99 JANG Jaewon - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
100 CHENG Thomas C. - 4% 25% 41% 25% 5%
101 PARK Luke J. 1% 5% 20% 36% 30% 8%
102 GEE Brandon - 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2%
103 SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. 1% 8% 23% 33% 25% 9% 1%
104 UPTON Michael 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6% -
105 VITI Mark G. - 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 4%
106 KO Tyler B. 25% 45% 25% 5% - - -
106 WU Wesley E. - 3% 16% 36% 34% 10% 1%
108 IYENGAR Amal N. - 8% 28% 38% 21% 5% -
109 EVGENEV Mark 4% 27% 39% 23% 7% 1% -
110 GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. - 1% 6% 24% 40% 25% 5%
111 CHOI Samuel 4% 25% 39% 24% 6% 1% -
112 OTAKE Jared K. - 3% 19% 36% 30% 11% 1%
113 WONG Adam L. - 4% 20% 36% 28% 9% 1%
114 LEE Caden - 1% 9% 26% 37% 23% 5%
115 WESTELIUS Isak R. - 6% 22% 36% 27% 8% -
116 NEWHARD Noah A. - 23% 44% 26% 6% - -
117 CHO SeungHyun 7% 27% 36% 23% 6% 1% -
118 MARTOS Jimmy 1% 9% 30% 37% 19% 4% -
119 BURKE Spencer W. - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3%
119 URODOVSKIKH Evan - 7% 27% 38% 23% 5% -
121 LA ROSA Federico 1% 8% 25% 37% 23% 6% -
122 TSAY Jeremy M. - 3% 14% 29% 32% 17% 3%
123 ZHENG Alan H. 5% 21% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
124 SELENDY Maximilian (Max) A. 2% 17% 38% 32% 10% 1% -
124 LIAO Alex J. - 3% 23% 43% 26% 5% -
126 PETER Griffin - 8% 28% 37% 21% 5% -
127 YI Stephen K. 5% 27% 39% 23% 5% - -
128 SHIH William - 3% 15% 35% 34% 11% 1%
129 ZENG Lucas H. - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
130 LI Simon A. - 7% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1%
131 LIU Eric P. - 3% 24% 49% 22% 3% -
132 CHAN Anthony 1% 7% 26% 40% 23% 4% -
132 MILLER Duncan R. 4% 25% 38% 24% 7% 1% -
134 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 4% -
135 IRVINE Jonathan J. - 1% 6% 21% 36% 29% 7%
136 MILLER Braeden G. 3% 16% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
137 CANNON Caiden C. 4% 22% 37% 27% 9% 1%
138 PAZ Ethan 2% 11% 28% 34% 21% 5% -
139 LANG Dong Lin 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
140 CRALEY Thomas M. 5% 20% 33% 28% 12% 2% -
140 CHENG Jonathan - - 1% 7% 28% 44% 20%
143 JEON Alexander E. - 1% 9% 27% 38% 21% 4%
144 LI James 12% 33% 34% 17% 4% - -
145 OH Samuel H. 1% 7% 27% 38% 22% 5% -
146 BALL James T. 1% 9% 26% 35% 22% 6% 1%
147 HELTON Noah - - 1% 10% 29% 40% 20%
148 BANERJEE ANUP - 1% 6% 23% 38% 26% 6%
149 BAE Junnie 4% 18% 32% 29% 14% 3% -
150 LAURICELLA Douglas 6% 24% 35% 25% 9% 1% -
151 SHERMAN Marco J. - - 3% 16% 36% 34% 11%
152 MAURER Ned (John) E. - 5% 19% 35% 29% 11% 1%
153 STANLEY Mason B. 3% 17% 36% 31% 11% 1%
154 CHIN Jason Y. 4% 20% 37% 29% 10% 1%
155 LOCKWOOD Owen - 3% 15% 35% 36% 11%
156 KIM Isaiah G. 37% 42% 18% 3% - -
157 AVRON Case B. 34% 53% 12% 1% - -
158 HO Ryan J. 3% 20% 37% 29% 10% 1% -
159 ZHANG Songhao Steven - 3% 27% 40% 24% 6% 1%
160 ROBSON Samuel 1% 7% 22% 33% 26% 9% 1%
161 LIN Dashiell 4% 25% 37% 24% 8% 1% -
161 LI Jiaan 5% 22% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
163 MAO Connor - 3% 16% 35% 33% 12% -
164 BATRAK Alexander 7% 30% 38% 20% 4% - -
164 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - 1% 6% 24% 39% 26% 5%
166 CHAN Tyler 8% 33% 39% 17% 3% - -
167 LI Raphael C. 14% 36% 33% 14% 3% - -
167 KIM Aaron J. 12% 38% 37% 11% 1% - -
169 LEE Connor C. 7% 30% 38% 20% 5% - -
169 CAI Jason Zhicheng 8% 31% 36% 19% 5% - -
171 DARIANO Noah G. - 2% 10% 27% 35% 21% 5%
172 TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) 9% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1% -
172 HSIUNG Richie 44% 42% 12% 2% - - -
172 KWON Ethan 7% 27% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
175 CATLIN Adam 5% 21% 34% 27% 10% 2% -
175 SOOD Kishan S. 21% 42% 27% 8% 1% - -
177 SINGH Dayaal - 3% 15% 33% 33% 15% 2%
178 PELOSKY Zack B. - 2% 10% 26% 35% 22% 5%
179 LAO Scott E. 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
180 FREEDMAN Samuel E. 1% 12% 32% 35% 16% 3% -
181 OAKLAND Brennan D. - 7% 28% 38% 21% 5% -
182 IVARSSON Oliver 1% 17% 38% 32% 11% 1% -
183 XIAO Anthony 62% 32% 6% 1% - - -
184 WELCH Ryan 15% 36% 32% 14% 3% - -
185 BARTEL Jacob L. 6% 28% 39% 21% 5% 1% -
186 MURUHIN Yaroslav 9% 36% 38% 15% 3% - -
187 WHITE-ROY Nolan 16% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
188 WAN Jason 3% 15% 30% 31% 17% 4% -
189 GIRALDO Pablo E. 7% 26% 36% 23% 8% 1% -
189 WANG Andrew 7% 55% 31% 7% 1% - -
191 XIAO EDWARD 18% 37% 30% 12% 2% - -
192 NEWELL Ian A. 22% 42% 27% 7% 1% - -
194 LEE Daniel C. - 2% 12% 30% 35% 17% 2%
195 YU Anders 8% 28% 36% 22% 6% 1%
196 MILLIAN Matthew 35% 45% 17% 3% - -
197 CHEN Andrew - 5% 27% 41% 23% 4%
198 SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. 15% 36% 32% 14% 3% -
199 DROUTMAN Ryan 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% -
200 KITAGAWA Eric S. 3% 19% 35% 29% 11% 2% -
201 GALLUCCI Charles John 15% 36% 32% 14% 3% - -
203 SHIKHMAN Robert - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13% -
203 SWEENEY Quinn 36% 49% 14% 1% - - -
205 ZHANG Luke T. 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
205 HOOSHI Jayden C. 2% 13% 32% 33% 16% 3% -
205 CHADHA Ananya Lev 1% 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
208 CUI Anthony 9% 41% 40% 10% 1% - -
209 SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. 8% 45% 35% 11% 2% - -
210 WEINKOPF William O. 1% 6% 23% 36% 26% 8% -
211 WONG NICHOLAS A. 4% 19% 34% 28% 12% 2% -
212 KIM Brandon J. 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
213 DANKAR Neel 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
214 BAE Kevin 5% 25% 37% 24% 8% 1% -
215 FUKUDA Renzo K. 2% 28% 41% 22% 6% 1% -
216 ZHAO Jesse 62% 31% 6% 1% - - -
216 CHIN Julian S. 9% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1% -
219 MURRAY Maximo 16% 41% 31% 10% 2% - -
219 LE Vyn A. 21% 42% 28% 8% 1% - -
221 SHAJI Karthik 9% 33% 39% 17% 3% - -
222 SANTULLI Tristan 10% 38% 36% 14% 2% - -
223 PHAM-CHANG Duke A. 63% 31% 5% - - - -
224 JEON Caleb A. 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
224 SEAH Chad 3% 19% 40% 29% 8% 1% -
226 STONE Henry J. 32% 43% 21% 5% - - -
228 ANTONIO Marcky C. 46% 42% 11% 1% - - -
229 WU Conrad J. 45% 39% 13% 2% - - -
230 WU Jerry 19% 39% 29% 11% 2% - -
231 CHEN Allen 9% 30% 37% 20% 5% - -
231 MCLAUGHLIN Lloyd I. 43% 40% 15% 3% - - -
234 WILLIAMS Connor J. 49% 39% 11% 1% - - -
234 FUKUDA Alessio R. 31% 43% 22% 5% - - -
234 MCCOSH Evin M. 35% 43% 18% 3% - - -
237 STIAGUN Nikita 17% 43% 31% 7% 1% - -
238 GU Jeffrey 17% 45% 30% 7% 1% - -
238 HAN Andersen Y. 33% 53% 13% 1% - - -
238 QIAN Michael < 1% 6% 27% 39% 23% 5% -
238 FINLEY Dylan 47% 40% 11% 1% - - -
242 GUO Zachary 42% 42% 14% 2% - - -
243 FAN Alex 86% 14% 1% - - - -
244 DU Samuel R. 5% 22% 35% 27% 10% 1% -
244 MU Jeffrey 40% 43% 15% 2% - - -
244 CUMMING Thomas 70% 27% 3% - - - -
244 KUO Evan 84% 16% 1% - - - -
248 SELIVANOV Adam 59% 33% 7% 1% - - -
249 FAN Kevin 35% 48% 15% 2% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.