Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
2 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
3 | BATRA Chaahat | - | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 49% |
3 | COOPER Piper W. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% |
5 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
6 | LI Sophia M. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
7 | LEE Ariana | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
8 | FOURNET-FAYARD Yaretzi | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 4% |
9 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | 6% | 43% | 43% | 8% |
10 | HAN Crystal | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 3% |
11 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | - | 4% | 25% | 50% | 21% |
12 | VO Bao-Vy | - | 5% | 28% | 46% | 19% | 2% |
13 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
14 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 2% | 21% | 48% | 26% | 4% | - |
15 | SHUM Elizabeth | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 2% |
16 | HAN Ashley | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
17 | ZHANG Selena | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
18 | SHUM Maya | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
19 | RODRIGUEZ Akemi | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - |
20 | CHOI Kailyn | 7% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
21 | SULTER Aurelie | 13% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
22 | DODDABALLAPUR Saanvi | 21% | 50% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
23 | KUNDU TRISHA | 13% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
24 | KO Claire | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
25 | CHERUKURI Nina | 5% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - |
26 | MADSEN Ansley | 44% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
27 | REYNOLDS Lourdes | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
28 | POPOKH Aleksandra | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
28 | DHEDHI Zoya | 30% | 45% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
30 | WESTRICK Sage | 62% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.