Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 80% |
2 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
3 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
3 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
5 | BLUM Leah I. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% | |
6 | JULIEN Michelle | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
7 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
8 | KER Grace | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
9 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 43% |
9 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
11 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% |
12 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
13 | LU Amy | - | 1% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
14 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
15 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% | |
16 | GHAYALOD reya | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
17 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 25% |
18 | HURST Kennedy | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
19 | LIN Audrey J. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
20 | XU Ellen | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 6% |
21 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | - | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
22 | WEI Vivian W. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
23 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
24 | JUNG Irene | - | 2% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 7% | - |
25 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
26 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
27 | HOLMES Emma | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
28 | SHI Cathleen | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
29 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 1% |
30 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 46% | 16% | |
31 | PAUL Lila | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
32 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 13% | 55% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
33 | HILD Nisha | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% |
34 | SZETO Chloe | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 8% |
35 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 3% |
36 | LIU Sophie | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
37 | CHEN Xinyan | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
38 | LIAO Siwen | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
39 | MARSEE Samantha | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 21% |
40 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
41 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
42 | FANG Victoria W. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
43 | LU Elaine | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
44 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
45 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
46 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 3% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
47 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
48 | CHANG Audrey | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
49 | LIGH Erenei J. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
50 | HUANG MADELINE | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
51 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% |
52 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 3% | 33% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
53 | CHEN Ashley | - | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
54 | XIAO julie | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
55 | JENKINS Scotland | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
56 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 4% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
57 | SADOVA Olga | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
58 | JOHNSTON Lily | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
59 | GOMES Diana C. | 1% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
60 | LIN Lauren | 18% | 55% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
61 | LUKER Sophia | 5% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
62 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
63 | CHIANG Emily | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
64 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | 3% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
65 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
66 | KHAN Alissa | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
67 | HE Lizbeth | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
68 | MANN Sophia J. | 20% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
69 | NEELEY Leilani | 66% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
70 | JEAN Olympe G. | - | 9% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
71 | CHEN Athena | 74% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
72 | SHANNON Sara | 77% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
72 | FERGUSON Aliya | 3% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
74 | FANG sophie | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
75 | HU Michelle | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
76 | YANG Lea | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
77 | MORAN Rhea | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
78 | WHITESIDES Abigail E. | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
79 | LIN Grace | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
79 | MCKEE Ainsley | 6% | 42% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
81 | CHO Michelle | 72% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
82 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.