Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
| 2 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 3 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 3 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 5 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
| 6 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 7 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 8 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 9 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
| 9 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
| 11 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 29% |
| 12 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 13 | LU Amy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 14 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 15 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
| 16 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% |
| 18 | HURST Kennedy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 3% |
| 19 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 20 | XU Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 6% |
| 21 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 35% |
| 24 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 25 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 26 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
| 27 | HOLMES Emma | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 28 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 29 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | 1% |
| 30 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 16% | |
| 31 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 32 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 100% | 87% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 5% |
| 34 | SZETO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 8% |
| 35 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 3% |
| 36 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 39 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% |
| 40 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 41 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% |
| 44 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
| 45 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 46 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 100% | 97% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 48 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
| 50 | HUANG MADELINE | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 7% |
| 52 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 100% | 97% | 64% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 54 | XIAO julie | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 100% | 96% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 57 | SADOVA Olga | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 58 | JOHNSTON Lily | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 60 | LIN Lauren | 100% | 82% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | LUKER Sophia | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 63 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 64 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 65 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 66 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 67 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 68 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | NEELEY Leilani | 100% | 34% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 70 | JEAN Olympe G. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 71 | CHEN Athena | 100% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 72 | SHANNON Sara | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 72 | FERGUSON Aliya | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 74 | FANG sophie | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 75 | HU Michelle | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | YANG Lea | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 77 | MORAN Rhea | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 78 | WHITESIDES Abigail E. | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 79 | LIN Grace | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 79 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 94% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | CHO Michelle | 100% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 82 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.