July Challenge & Parafencing Nat'l Championships

Cadet Men's Saber

Sunday, July 25, 2021 at 8:15 AM

Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 JI Cody Walter V V V V V V V V V V V V 4.7 6 +1.3
2 YUN Jake V V V V V D V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
3 HO Kaden M. D V V D D V V V V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
3 SO Hananiah V V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
5 CHON Taylor A. V V V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
6 WU Mengke V V D V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
7 FENG Leo V V D V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
8 KOTOV Leonid V V V D D D V V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
9 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
9 DHINGRA Gian K. V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
11 TONG ZACHARY V D V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
12 HONG Vincent Q. V V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
13 WANG Eric Y. V V V D D V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
14 SHIRPAL Oleksandr D V V V D V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
15 JIANG Anthony D V D V V V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
16 LINSKY Matthew V D V D V D V V V D 5.2 3 -2.2
17 LIANG Connor V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
18 HOUTZ Jackson V V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
19 CHIN Matthew W. V D V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
20 YUN Jaesun D V V D V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
21 KIM Shaun M. V V V D D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
22 WOODWARD Connor V V D V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
23 SHOMAN Noah V V V D V D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
24 SIMAK Joseph P. D V V V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
24 LEE Justin D V V V D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
26 NOBLE Colin D V D V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
27 MARGULIES William V D V V D V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
28 GUZZO Vito D V V V D V V D 3.0 3 -
29 BULL Anderson D V D V V V V D 3.0 3 -
30 HAN Daniel Y. V D D V D V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
31 ATANASSOV Vasil V. V D D V D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
32 HONG Steven D D D D V V V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
33 TANN Justin V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
34 KIM Alexander M. V V V V V D D 4.4 5 +0.6
35 LUKASHENKO Darii V V D V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
35 ERMAKOV Lev V V D V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
37 BERMAN Luca V V V D V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
38 GHAYALOD ansh V D V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
39 YANG Duncan (BoTong) V V V V D V D 3.7 5 +1.3
40 HUANG Alexander C. V V V V V D D 2.3 5 +2.7
41 DU Gavin J. V V D V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
42 FERNANDEZ Rodrigo V D V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
43 GREENBAUM Ian L. D V V V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
44 XU Andrew V D V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
45 NAZLYMOV Andrei V V V D V D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
46 HOLZ Daniel V D D V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
47 STONE Esmond A. D V D V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
48 BABAYEV Gabriel A. V V D D V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
49 CHOI Silas V D V D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
50 CHEONG Heonjae D V D V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
51 ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. V D V V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
52 KAKEHI Nicholas B. D V D V V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
53 COLE Alexander V V V D D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
54 KIBBAR Tomer L. V D D D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
55 MORRILL William D D V V D V V D 4.9 3 -1.9
55 ZHENG Edward L. D D V V D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
57 QIU Nathan V D V D V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
57 HOLZ William A. D V D V D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
59 ROSBERG Dashiell W. V D V V D D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
60 MAKLIN Edward P. V V D D D V V D 3.0 3 -
61 XU William D V D D V V D 3.1 2 -1.1
62 SWORDS Evan F. V D D D V D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
63 DOLAN Charles R. D D D V D V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
64 ZHANG Yankun D D V D V D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
65 SANDERS Samuel B. V D V V V D D 2.6 4 +1.4
66 ZUBATIY Samuel V D D V V V D 4.0 4 -
67 CHEN Evan P. V D V V V D D 1.8 4 +2.2
68 WU Richard V V D V V D D 1.2 4 +2.8
69 ZHOU Miles V D V V D D 2.4 3 +0.6
70 MCCARTHY Gabriel V D V D V D 1.8 3 +1.2
71 POPE Nico V D D V D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
72 REN James D V D V D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
73 SHOMAN Zachary V D V V D D D 4.1 3 -1.1
74 ALTIRS Giorgio V D V D D V D 1.3 3 +1.7
75 OVERDECK Andrew D V V D V D D 2.9 3 +0.1
76 RHEE Ethan N. D D V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
76 KUMAR Sachit D V D V V D D 0.9 3 +2.1
78 LEE Aydan J. V D D D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
79 RAJAN Advait V D D V D V D 1.2 3 +1.8
80 BONSELL Vance D D V D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
81 CHANG Colin S. V V D D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
82 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. D V V D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
83 MOULTON Ian V D V D D D 0.8 2 +1.2
84 HJERPE Wade H. V D V D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
85 DENG Andrew V D D D V D D 3.1 2 -1.1
86 GOLDMAN Noah R. D V V D D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
87 OH Triton D D V V D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
87 BONN-ELCHONESS Peter D D D D V V D 0.2 2 +1.8
89 LU Caleb Q. D V V D D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
90 HUANG Tom D D D D V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
91 KUSHKOV Veniamin D D V D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
92 RADY-PENTEK Charles A. V D D D V D D 2.0 2 -
92 LIU Mingyang Ryan V V D D D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
94 LIN Daniel D V D D V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
95 LIU Christopher X. D V D V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
96 CHTERENTAL Alex V D V D D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
97 YANG Ziyi V V D D D D 4.4 2 -2.4
97 ZHOU Brian D D D V V D D 3.1 2 -1.1
99 AVAKIAN Alec D D V D D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
100 TANG Alex Y. D D V D D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
101 EICHHORN Lukas H. D D D V D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
102 WANG Nicolas D V D V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
103 ZHOU Aeres Z. D D V D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
104 MISHRA Aadi V V D D D D 0.4 2 +1.6
105 LINDHOLM Oliver S. D D D D V 2.2 1 -1.2
106 ZHANG Derek D D D D V 1.8 1 -0.8
107 NG Jeremiah D D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
108 PIWOWAR Alex D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
109 SCHERER Max D D V D D 1.7 1 -0.7
110 VO Minh Q. D V D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
110 GHENEA George Philipe D V D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
112 KIM Ryan D D D D V 0.8 1 +0.2
113 CHEN Leo D D D V D D 3.6 1 -2.6
114 LANNAMAN Connor D V D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
115 BERRIO Carter E. D D D V D D 3.8 1 -2.8
116 BROU Inkosi D D D V D D 2.6 1 -1.6
117 KIM Andrew H. D D D V D D 3.8 1 -2.8
118 ZHANG Jeffrey D V D D D D 3.0 1 -2.0
119 CHEONG Heonjun D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
120 ZHU Charlie D D D D V D 0.9 1 +0.1
121 LEUNG Nathan D V D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
122 CHAN Aidan D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
123 DUDNICK Christian D D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
124 PERRON Robert D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
125 VELTZ Tyler J. D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
126 GRATHWOL-SEAR Oliver D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
126 WANG Liuao D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
128 MONSON Eli D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.