Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | MACZIK Adam W. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
2 | RANES Evan | D V V V V | V V V V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
3 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
3 | BARREIRO Darren | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
5 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
6 | CRANOR Erich L. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
7 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | V V V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
8 | FRANK Fred | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
9 | PHO Eric | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
10 | WAY Kashi M. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
11 | GOOSSENS Bruno | D V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
12 | NEWSOME James L. | V V V V D | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
13 | BRAND Wesley M. | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
14 | TEITENBERG John F. | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
15 | WILKINSON Derek H. | V V D V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
16 | SEAMAN C. Scott (Scott) | V D D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
17 | KENT Dwain | V D V V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
18 | MARSHALL Wesley | D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
19 | HUGHES Michael D. | V V V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
20 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | V D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
21 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | V V D V D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
22 | PIERRO Roger | V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
23 | SIMS Martin L. | D D V D V V | V D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
24 | WRIGHT Andrew M. | V D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
25 | HESS Marc F. | V D V D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
26 | STOCK Jordan | D D V D V | V D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
27 | GERSEN Jacob | D D V V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
28 | CLARK Timothy J. | V D D D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
29 | COLE Matthew | V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
30 | EDWARDS Tim | D D V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
31 | HARRELL D. Fox | D D V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
32 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | D V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
33 | CHENG Thomas | V V D V D V | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
34 | WAGMAN Robert S. | V V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
35 | RYAN Christopher | D V V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
36 | SKOPIK Jr August | D V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
37 | BECK Brian C. | D D V V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
38 | SAYLOR David A. | V V V D D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
39 | PERKA Michael | V D D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
40 | EVANS Allen L. | D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
41 | PARY Theodore | D D D V V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
42 | ALLEN Melvin | D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
43 | SCHWARY Irv | V D D D V | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
44 | CROUCH William John (John) | D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
45 | MIKULSKI Michael | V V D D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
46 | KIM Jeff | D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
47 | OCHS Bradley C. | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
48 | SPAHN Jeff | D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
49 | VAUGHN David | D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
50 | STEINWACHS Mark | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
51 | WILLIAMS Richard | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
52 | NOLAN Hartwell (Ed) (Ed) E. | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
53 | HARTIGAN Joe | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
54 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
55 | CHEN Steve | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
56 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
57 | MANOUKIAN David | D D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.