Hoosick, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MELNYCHUK Liza | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
| 2 | MARYASH Samantha | 1% | 8% | 33% | 43% | 15% | |
| 3 | NATHANSON Sammy | - | - | 4% | 31% | 64% | |
| 3 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
| 5 | XIKES Katherine | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 29% | |
| 6 | BULBA Daria | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 7 | NAYAK Esha | 1% | 9% | 35% | 46% | 9% | - |
| 8 | KHAN Alissa | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% | |
| 9 | KOUROUSI Anna Kalliopi | - | - | 1% | 19% | 69% | 11% |
| 10 | MUND Ruth | 3% | 20% | 44% | 29% | 4% | |
| 11 | KNOBEL Sophia | 4% | 26% | 46% | 22% | 2% | |
| 12 | DONG Angel | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 13 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 1% | 9% | 35% | 45% | 10% | |
| 14 | SHTREVENSKY Maria | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 15 | PENNER Tabitha | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 12% | |
| 16 | SADOVA Olga | 2% | 15% | 40% | 36% | 7% | |
| 17 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 52% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 18 | LIM Alexa | 57% | 36% | 7% | - | - | |
| 19 | MARGULIAN Maria | 29% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 20 | GIBEK Victoria | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 19% | 47% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | LAGOON Miriam | 14% | 47% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | FIGELMAN Maya | 4% | 32% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 24 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 42% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | BERNARD Kathryn | 19% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | FREEMAN Armine | 10% | 40% | 42% | 9% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.