Hoosick, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V V V V | V V V V V | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
2 | FOTIYEV Alan R. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
3 | MAKLIN Edward | V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
3 | NOBLE Colin | V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
5 | KOGAN Benjamin | V V V V V | V V | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
6 | BULBA Daria | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
7 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
8 | ZENG Noah | D D V V | V V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
9 | BARTOLO Dominic | V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
10 | GONZALEZ Emilio | V V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
11 | MELNYCHUK Liza | V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
12 | EYBELMAN Ariel | D V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
13 | KANG Evan | V D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
14 | NATHANSON Sammy | V V V D | V V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
15 | KOUROUSI Anna Kalliopi | V D D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
16 | KESSLER Nathan | D D D D | V V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
17 | KWALWASSER Eric | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
18 | MEHAN Nicholas | V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
19 | MARYASH Samantha | V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
20 | KATZ Ryan | V V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
21 | PERRON Robert | V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
22 | RASTEGAEV Evghenii | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
23 | NGUYEN Anthony | V D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
24 | RASTEGAEV Andrei | V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
25 | LIN Phillip | D V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
26 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
27 | SMIRNOV Nicholas | V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
28 | LEUNG Ian | V D V D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
29 | CHAN Aidan | D V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
30 | SADOVA Olga | V D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
31 | XIKES Katherine | D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
32 | BERNARD Kathryn | D D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
33 | THORNHILL Kwasi | V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
34 | ZHU Weiqi | D V V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
35 | MUND Ruth | V D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
36 | KNOBEL Sophia | V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
37 | ORLOV Kyrylo | V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
38 | BODEAN Igor | D D V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
39 | SHTREVENSKY Maria | D D V D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
40 | LIM Brandon | V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
41 | NAYAK Esha | V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
41 | LEI Antoine | V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
43 | DONG Angel | D D V D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
44 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
45 | HALL Noah | D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
46 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
47 | MARGULIAN Maria | D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
48 | YOSHEA Henry | D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
49 | CHO Ryan | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
50 | PENNER Tabitha | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
51 | LAGOON Miriam | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
52 | GOMERMAN Sophia | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
53 | GIBEK Victoria | D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
54 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
55 | RARU Bogdan | D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
56 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | D D D D | D | 3.6 | 0 | -3.6 |
57 | LIU Andrew | D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
58 | LIM Alexa | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
59 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
60 | LEVI D'ANCONA Leone | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
61 | JIN David | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.