New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
2 | KLAR Isaac A. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
3 | WILSON Jude | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
3 | SO Hananiah | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
5 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% |
6 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% | |
7 | SKINNER Graham B. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
8 | HO Kaden M. | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - | |
9 | LIU Kelly | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% | |
10 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
11 | LUKASHENKO Darii | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
12 | TASIKAS Stylianos | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | |
13 | HUANG Tyler T. | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
14 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
15 | HUANG Maxwell H. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
16 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | 1% | 13% | 38% | 37% | 12% | |
17 | CHENG Kyle | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 14% |
18 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 7% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
19 | YUAN Kevin | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
20 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
21 | LUTHRA Arjun | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
22 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 10% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
23 | LO Alexander | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
24 | DEISBOECK Maximilian S. | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
25 | WU Wilmund | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
26 | HUANG Alexander C. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 1% | |
27 | SHTEIN Yan | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - | |
28 | LEE Derek J. | 23% | 49% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
29 | SKABICH Nicholas | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
30 | ZHENG Edward L. | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 1% | |
31 | HONG Vincent Q. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
32 | SHIPITSIN Yaroslav | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
33 | APTER Robert A. | 2% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
34 | RUIGOMEZ Eduardo | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
35 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
36 | LEUNG Andrew K. | 5% | 30% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
37 | LEONARD Charles | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
38 | SMITH Vaughn | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
39 | ANGKATAVANICH Owen | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
40 | BURNS Jackson P. | 5% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
41 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
42 | DOLAN Charles R. | 18% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
43 | SMINK Oliver | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
44 | PARKER Benjamin D. | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
45 | MCCARTHY Devan | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.