New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 2 | KLAR Isaac A. | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | WILSON Jude | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | SO Hananiah | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 5 | CHAN Matthew | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 6 | MAKLIN Edward P. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 7 | SKINNER Graham B. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 8 | HO Kaden M. | D V D V V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 9 | LIU Kelly | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 10 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 11 | LUKASHENKO Darii | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 12 | TASIKAS Stylianos | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 13 | HUANG Tyler T. | V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 14 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | D D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 15 | HUANG Maxwell H. | V D D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | D V D V D | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 17 | CHENG Kyle | D V V V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 18 | EDELMAN Seth A. | V V V D V D | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 19 | YUAN Kevin | V V D V D V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 20 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V V V V D D | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 21 | LUTHRA Arjun | V V V D D V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 22 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | V V V D D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 23 | LO Alexander | V V D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | DEISBOECK Maximilian S. | D D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 25 | WU Wilmund | D D V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 26 | HUANG Alexander C. | V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 27 | SHTEIN Yan | D V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 28 | LEE Derek J. | D D D V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 29 | SKABICH Nicholas | V D V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 30 | ZHENG Edward L. | D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 31 | HONG Vincent Q. | D D D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 32 | SHIPITSIN Yaroslav | D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 33 | APTER Robert A. | D D D V V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 34 | RUIGOMEZ Eduardo | V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 35 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | V D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 36 | LEUNG Andrew K. | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 37 | LEONARD Charles | D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 38 | SMITH Vaughn | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 39 | ANGKATAVANICH Owen | V D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 40 | BURNS Jackson P. | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 41 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 42 | DOLAN Charles R. | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 43 | SMINK Oliver | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 44 | PARKER Benjamin D. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 45 | MCCARTHY Devan | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.