New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | < 1% | |
| 2 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 3 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 3 | SINHA Anika | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 5 | MIKA Veronica | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 6 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% | |
| 7 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 8 | BOIS Adele | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 9 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
| 10 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 11 | LI Amanda C. | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 12 | TAO Hannah J. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 13 | MAREK Sofia | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | LEVITIS Danielle | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
| 15 | MANSPERGER Leena | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 16 | HILD Nisha | 3% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | SADOVA Olga | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
| 18 | NATHANSON Samantha E. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 19 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 20 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 21 | NEIBART Fiona | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 22 | KRYLOVA Valery | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
| 23 | GRINBERG Aliya | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | SU Emma | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | JIN Olivia P. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 13% | 3% |
| 26 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 27 | PAUL Lila | 2% | 16% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 28 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 29 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% | |
| 30 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | KIM Marley I. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LEE Sophia | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 33 | PASHIN Anna | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 34 | SULLIVAN Caroline | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 35 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | MANGAN Lillian Marsh | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 37 | LAU Jovana Y. | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 38 | LU Elaine | 14% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | DAVIS Jordan | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 40 | LITVAK-HINENZON Michaela | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | MCKEE Ainsley | 1% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 42 | NAYAK Anika | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 18% | 2% | |
| 42 | HUANG Caroline | 18% | 49% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 44 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 45 | JAVERI Amaya | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.