New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ALCEBAR Kayla | V V V V V | V V V V V | 1.8 | 5 | +3.2 |
| 2 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 3 | PRIEUR Lauren | V V V D D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | SINHA Anika | V V D V V D | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 5 | MIKA Veronica | V V V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 6 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 7 | BAKER Audrey C. | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 8 | BOIS Adele | V V V D D D | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 9 | SHOMAN Jenna | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 10 | SHOMAN Miriam | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 11 | LI Amanda C. | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 12 | TAO Hannah J. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 13 | MAREK Sofia | D V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 14 | LEVITIS Danielle | D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 15 | MANSPERGER Leena | D V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 16 | HILD Nisha | V D D V D | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | SADOVA Olga | V D V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 18 | NATHANSON Samantha E. | D V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 19 | OBRADOVIC Ana | V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 20 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | D V V V D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 21 | NEIBART Fiona | D D V V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 22 | KRYLOVA Valery | V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 23 | GRINBERG Aliya | V V D D V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 24 | SU Emma | D V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | JIN Olivia P. | V D D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 26 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | D D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 27 | PAUL Lila | D D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 28 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | LIGH Erenei J. | D V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 30 | CHIOLDI Mina | D D D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 31 | KIM Marley I. | D D D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 32 | LEE Sophia | D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 33 | PASHIN Anna | D D V V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 34 | SULLIVAN Caroline | D V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 35 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 36 | MANGAN Lillian Marsh | V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 37 | LAU Jovana Y. | V D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 38 | LU Elaine | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 39 | DAVIS Jordan | V D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 40 | LITVAK-HINENZON Michaela | D D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 41 | MCKEE Ainsley | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 42 | NAYAK Anika | D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| 42 | HUANG Caroline | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 44 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 45 | JAVERI Amaya | D D D D D D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.