Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | GRIFFITH Joseph (Joe) | 100% | 91% | 41% | |||
| 2 | BLAKEMAN Michael | 100% | 92% | 58% | 16% | 2% | |
| 3 | MORALES Victoria | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 3 | CURTIS Daniel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
| 5 | TAGUE JONATHAN | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 7% |
| 6 | DUNN Linda J | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 7 | GOSMEYER Matthew | 100% | 80% | 30% | |||
| 8 | BRUTUS Caleb | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | FARIDI Imran | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 11 | PETRIKIN Annika | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 12 | GALATI savannah | 100% | 51% | 7% | |||
| 13 | SAWYER Edward | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 8% | |
| 15 | SHAW Robert | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 16 | SIMPKISS Andrew | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.