Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WEINTRAUB Maia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
| 2 | PUSTILNIK Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 3 | DESCHNER Stefani K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 3 | RHODES Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 5 | SCRUGGS Lauren S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 6 | CHO Sabrina N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 7 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
| 8 | BLOW Iman (Mani) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |
| 9 | GUO Jessica Zi Jia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 10 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 8% | |
| 11 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 2% |
| 13 | DEVORE Delphine P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 14 | LEE Alina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
| 15 | TIEU May L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 16 | TAFFEL sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 34% |
| 17 | NOTT Adrienne (Adi) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 9% |
| 18 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 19 | PETROVA Kristina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% | |
| 20 | ZEISS Madison E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 24% |
| 21 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 8% | |
| 22 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
| 23 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 24 | MYRONIUK Dariia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 25 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 26 | YAROSHENKO Karina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 2% |
| 27 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 28 | LUONG Paige K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
| 29 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 9% |
| 30 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | CHENG Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | |
| 32 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 33 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | < 1% |
| 34 | OH Erin H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 35 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 37 | CAO Ying | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 38 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | ZHANG Yunjia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 40 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 42 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 4% |
| 43 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | KOO Rachel A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 45 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 46 | APELIAN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 17% | |
| 47 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 48 | FEDELI Caterina S. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 49 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 50 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 51 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 52 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 53 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 46% | 17% | 3% |
| 55 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 56 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 57 | ZHENG Vivian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 58 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 58 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 60 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% | |
| 61 | PARK Rowan M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 61 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | |
| 63 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 64 | HUNG Juliana K. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 65 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 65 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 67 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 68 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 69 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 70 | ADLER Polly Z. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
| 71 | QIAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 72 | CRUM Quinn T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 73 | HE Elizabeth W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 74 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
| 75 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 76 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 77 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 79 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% | 2% |
| 80 | MI Aileen | 100% | 88% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 82 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 83 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 49% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 84 | CHEN Jessie S. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 85 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 86 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 88 | TALAVERA Daena | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 3% |
| 89 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 90 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 91 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 92 | JØRGENSEN Laeticia Laura Wargniez | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 93 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 94 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 95 | LUKINS Tianji | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | |
| 96 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 97 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 98 | DEBACK Greta I. | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 99 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 100 | GLASSON Sophia | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 101 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 102 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 103 | WU Kyra | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 104 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 105 | HORSLEY Asherah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 105 | LI Shuang | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 107 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 108 | SEMEL Liana M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 109 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 110 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 111 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 112 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 113 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 93% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 113 | O'NEIL Neve | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 115 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 93% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 115 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 117 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 118 | WALKER Mayah J. | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 119 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 120 | BOLES Sophia | 100% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.