Minneapolis, MN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | PARK Faith K. | D V V V D V | V V V V V V V | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
2 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | V D V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
3 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
3 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
5 | KETKAR Ketki | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
6 | HURLEY Courtney L. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
7 | JOYCE Michaela | V D V V V D | V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
8 | HURLEY Kelley A. | V V D D V D | V V V V D | 5.4 | 3 | -2.4 |
9 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
10 | HU Grace | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
11 | ZUHARS Renee A. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
12 | DING Jiahe (Heidi) | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
13 | MACHULSKY Leehi | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
14 | FORNARIS Susana | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
15 | TOBY Natalia R. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
16 | WU Amelia | V D D D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
17 | BASSA Francesca A. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
18 | LIN Jessica Y. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
19 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | V V V V D V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
20 | NING Emma | V V V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
21 | LONADIER Keira | D V V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
22 | KORFONTA Jolie | V D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
23 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | V D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
24 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
25 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | V V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
26 | VERMEULE Emily | D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
27 | JAKEL Sophia N. | V D V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
28 | GU Sarah | V D V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
29 | GRADY Miriam A. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
30 | WATRALL Christina | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
31 | LEE Michelle J. | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
32 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | V D D D D V | V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
33 | GANDHI Sedna S. | V V V V V D | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
34 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | V V V D V V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
35 | VERRET Alexanne | V V D V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
36 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | V V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
37 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | D V V D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
37 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | V D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
39 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | V D V V V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
39 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | V V D D V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
41 | CEBULA Anne | D V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
42 | NGUYEN Tallulah | V D V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
43 | RUNIONS Emersyn | D V V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
44 | NIXON Caroline (Karolina) L. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
45 | MEHROTRA Anya | V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
46 | LUO Ashley | D V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
47 | WU Fan | D V V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
48 | MCLANE Lauren | D V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
49 | LIN Waiyuk | V D D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
50 | KIM Zoe L. | D V V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
51 | LU Junyao | V D D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
52 | CHIN Isabella | V V D D V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
53 | BEI Karen | D V D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
54 | YAO Melinda | D V V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
55 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
56 | MAO Amy | V V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
57 | GAO Judy | D V D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
58 | LEE Sumin | D V D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
59 | CHEN Lefu | D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
60 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | V D D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
61 | WANG Elizabeth | D D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
62 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | D V D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
63 | WITTE Vera | D V D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
64 | XIAO Ruien | D D V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
65 | WANG Karen | V V V V D D | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
66 | CHU Audrey | V V D V V D | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
67 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | V V D D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
68 | YANG Alisa | V V D V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
69 | TYLER Syd | D D V V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
70 | FALLON Kyle R. | D D V D V V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
71 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | V V V D D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
72 | XUAN Nicole J. | D D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
73 | LI Alisha | D V D V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
74 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | V D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
75 | LAVERY Chloe K. | V D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
76 | LEUNG Natalie | D V V V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
77 | LAN Alice S. | D D V D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
78 | CALDERA Lexi I. | D V V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
79 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | V V D D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
80 | WEBER Nora | D V V D V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
81 | FENG ge | V V D D D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
82 | COBERT Helen G. | D D V D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
83 | WELLS Tessa (Tesla) M. | V V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
84 | REID Sobia | V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
85 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | D D V V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
86 | SHU Youshan | D D D V D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
87 | LIN Katie Y. | D D V D V D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
88 | YOU Emily | D D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
89 | MUELLER Emma M. | D D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
90 | WANG Nora | D D V D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
90 | LIU Christina A. | V D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
92 | YIN Julia | D D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
93 | KALE Anika A. | D D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
93 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | V V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
95 | SWENSON Nikita G. | V D V D D D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 | |
96 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | V D V D D D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 | |
97 | ZHANG Victoria R. | D V V D D D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 | |
97 | LU Shiqi | D D V D V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 | |
99 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | D V D V D D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 | |
100 | LURYE Sarah | D D D V V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 | |
101 | FILIPPOV Nika D. | V D D D D V | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 | |
101 | ISERT Sarah | D V D D V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 | |
103 | SMITH Grace L. | D V D V D D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 | |
104 | KENT Elizabeth J. | D D V D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
105 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | D D D V D D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
106 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | V D D D D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
107 | PADHYE Tanishka | D D D V D D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 | |
108 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | D D V D D D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
109 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | D D D D V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
110 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | D V D D D D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 | |
111 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | D D D V D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
112 | ASSADOURIAN Nouneh | D V D D D D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
113 | WEISS Talia L. | V D D D D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
113 | PAPADAKIS Lily | D V D D D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
115 | HAFEEZ Hania | D D V D D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
116 | REID Anousheh | D D D V D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
117 | BOTNER Olivia | D D D D V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
118 | CHA Eugenie | D D V D D D | 1.0 | 1 | - | |
119 | SHEN Stephanie | D V D D D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
120 | BUSH Emma | D D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
121 | PEHLIVANI Zara | D D D D D D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 | |
122 | KETKAR Mallika | D D D D D D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 | |
123 | LEUNG Wan Kiu Hayley | D D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
124 | YU Nicole J. | D D D D D D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 | |
125 | LIN Ashley | D D D D D D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.