Minneapolis, MN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | D V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
2 | POSSICK Lola P. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
3 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
3 | LINDER Kara E. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
5 | RUSSO Francesca | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
6 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
7 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
8 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
9 | KIM Zoe | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
10 | KOVACS Sophia | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
11 | GOUHIN Chloe | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
12 | PAK Kaitlyn | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
13 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
14 | KONG Vera | V V V D D D | V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
15 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | V D D V D D | V V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
16 | XIKES Katherine E. | V D D D D V | V V V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
17 | JOHNSON Honor | V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
18 | LU Vivian Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
19 | MILLER Sky | V V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
20 | LEE Alexandra B. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
21 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
22 | TAO Hannah J. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
23 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
23 | BOIS Adele | V V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
25 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
26 | SHEALY Maggie | D V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
27 | OISHI Megumi | V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
28 | ANDRES Katherine A. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
29 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
30 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
31 | LU Elaine | V V D D V D | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
32 | PEDRAZA Regina | D D V D V | V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
33 | TONG Kunling | V V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
34 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | V V D V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
35 | KAKHIANI-MECKLING Teodora | V V D V V V | D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
36 | JENKINS Ryan J. | V D V V V V | D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
37 | LIN Audrey J. | V V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
38 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | V V V V D | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
39 | MIKA Veronica | V V V D D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
40 | HILD Nisha | V D V V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
41 | SAYLES Nina R. | V D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
42 | JUNG Irene | V V D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
43 | CAO Stephanie X. | V D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
44 | CHIN Erika J. | D D V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
45 | TZOU Alexandra | D D V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
46 | MARSEE Samantha | D V D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
47 | LIGH Erenei J. | V D V D V D | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
48 | SZETO Chloe | V V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
49 | FEARNS Zara A. | D D D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
50 | SHOMAN Jenna | D V D V D V | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
51 | VADASZ Ibla P. | D V D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
52 | CODY Alexandra C. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
53 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | D V D V V D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
54 | PAUL Lila | D D V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
55 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
56 | JULIEN Michelle | V D D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
57 | HE Charlotte | V D D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
58 | THEODORE Maria A. | V D D D V D | V D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
59 | BLUM Leah I. | D V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
60 | KER Grace | D V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
61 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | D D D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
62 | CHIN Sophia J. | V D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
63 | GHAYALOD Reya | D D V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
64 | BUHAY Rachel T. | D D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
65 | SHI Cathleen | V D V D V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
66 | CHEN Xiaohan | V D V D V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
67 | LI Amanda C. | V D V D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
68 | DUCKETT Madison | D V V V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
69 | SADIK HANA | V V D V D V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
70 | JOHNSON Lauren | V D V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
71 | DRAGON Rainer | D D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
72 | YODER Bridget H. | V V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
73 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | V D V D V D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
74 | LEE Hannah | D V D D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
75 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | D V V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
76 | LI Victoria J. | D D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
77 | LACSON Sarah | D V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
78 | SHEARER Natalie E. | V V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
79 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | D D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
80 | KIM Marley I. | D V V V D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
81 | NEWELL Alexia C. | V D V V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
82 | KRASTEV Minna | D D V V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
83 | SATHYANATH Kailing | D V V D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
84 | NATH Trisha | V D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
85 | HARRISON Imogen N. | V V D D V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
86 | OLSEN Natalie J. | D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
87 | TONG Jessie | D V D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
88 | MCKEE Brynnley | V D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
89 | PALEO Gabriella | D D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
90 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | V V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
91 | PRIEUR Lauren | V D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
92 | LIU Sophie | V D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
93 | GORMAN Victoria M. | D D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
93 | YANG Ashley M. | D V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
95 | SUN Alyssa | D V D D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
96 | XI Shining | D D D V D V | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 | |
97 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | V D D D D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
98 | XIAO julie | D V D D D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
99 | TIBURCIO Diana | D D D D V | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
100 | BROWN Emma | D D V D D D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 | |
101 | BILILIES Sophia | D D D D V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 | |
102 | LU Amy | D D V D D D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
103 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | D V D D D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
104 | ALCEBAR Kayla | D D D D D V | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
105 | SINHA Anika | D D V D D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
105 | FANG Victoria W. | D V D D D D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
105 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | V D D D D D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 | |
108 | GHOSH Priyanka | V D D D D D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 | |
108 | NI Sharon | D D D V D D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
110 | ERIKSON Kira R. | D D V D D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
110 | NEIBART Fiona | D D D V D D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
112 | CHIANG Emily | D D D D D V | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
113 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | V D D D D D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 | |
114 | ENDO Miyuki N. | D V D D D D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 | |
114 | YANG Lea | D D D D D V | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 | |
116 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | D D D V D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
116 | BARNOVITZ Maya | D D D D D V | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
118 | HWANG Gabriela M. | D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
119 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | D D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
120 | YANG Angelina LeLe | D D D D D D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 | |
121 | YUAN Greta | D D D D D D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 | |
122 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | D D D D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
122 | LEE Sophia | D D D D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
124 | WEI Vivian W. | D D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.