Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
2 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
3 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% | |
3 | LINDER Kara E. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
5 | RUSSO Francesca | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
6 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
7 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
8 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
9 | KIM Zoe | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 41% |
10 | KOVACS Sophia | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
11 | GOUHIN Chloe | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
12 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | 2% | 10% | 33% | 43% | 13% |
13 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
14 | KONG Vera | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
15 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
16 | XIKES Katherine E. | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
17 | JOHNSON Honor | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 64% | |
18 | LU Vivian Y. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
19 | MILLER Sky | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
20 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
21 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 71% |
22 | TAO Hannah J. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
23 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
23 | BOIS Adele | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
25 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
26 | SHEALY Maggie | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
27 | OISHI Megumi | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 49% | 14% | |
28 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 2% |
29 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
30 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
31 | LU Elaine | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | PEDRAZA Regina | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - | |
33 | TONG Kunling | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
34 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
35 | KAKHIANI-MECKLING Teodora | - | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 40% | 37% |
36 | JENKINS Ryan J. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
37 | LIN Audrey J. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
38 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
39 | MIKA Veronica | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
40 | HILD Nisha | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
41 | SAYLES Nina R. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 4% | - |
42 | JUNG Irene | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
43 | CAO Stephanie X. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% | |
44 | CHIN Erika J. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
45 | TZOU Alexandra | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
46 | MARSEE Samantha | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
47 | LIGH Erenei J. | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
48 | SZETO Chloe | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
49 | FEARNS Zara A. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
50 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
51 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
52 | CODY Alexandra C. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
53 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% |
54 | PAUL Lila | 4% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
55 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 5% |
56 | JULIEN Michelle | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
57 | HE Charlotte | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
58 | THEODORE Maria A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
59 | BLUM Leah I. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
60 | KER Grace | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
61 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
62 | CHIN Sophia J. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
63 | GHAYALOD Reya | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
64 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
65 | SHI Cathleen | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
66 | CHEN Xiaohan | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
67 | LI Amanda C. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
68 | DUCKETT Madison | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
69 | SADIK HANA | 9% | 27% | 33% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
70 | JOHNSON Lauren | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
71 | DRAGON Rainer | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
72 | YODER Bridget H. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
73 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 33% | 29% | 10% |
74 | LEE Hannah | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
75 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 3% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
76 | LI Victoria J. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
77 | LACSON Sarah | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
78 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
79 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
80 | KIM Marley I. | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
81 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
82 | KRASTEV Minna | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
83 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
84 | NATH Trisha | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
85 | HARRISON Imogen N. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
86 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 2% | |
87 | TONG Jessie | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | - | |
88 | MCKEE Brynnley | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
89 | PALEO Gabriella | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
90 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
91 | PRIEUR Lauren | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
92 | LIU Sophie | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
93 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
93 | YANG Ashley M. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
95 | SUN Alyssa | 17% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
96 | XI Shining | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - |
97 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 4% | - | |
98 | XIAO julie | 18% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
99 | TIBURCIO Diana | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
100 | BROWN Emma | 1% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
101 | BILILIES Sophia | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
102 | LU Amy | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
103 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
104 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
105 | SINHA Anika | 25% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
105 | FANG Victoria W. | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
105 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
108 | GHOSH Priyanka | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
108 | NI Sharon | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
110 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
110 | NEIBART Fiona | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
112 | CHIANG Emily | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
113 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
114 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 9% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
114 | YANG Lea | 41% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
116 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
116 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
118 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
119 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 26% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
120 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
121 | YUAN Greta | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
122 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
122 | LEE Sophia | 31% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
124 | WEI Vivian W. | 13% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.