Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHO Inga | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 74% |
2 | DE LA FOSCADE-CONDON Celine | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% | |
3 | PIERRYNOWSKI Kathryn S. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 32% | 4% |
3 | SETHRE Traci | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
5 | KAING Selina (Hourng) | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
6 | CHOY Ida | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
7 | MCGRATH Polina S. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
8 | LIPPMAN Soyeon | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
9 | READ Sarah | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
10 | ROMANO Megan C. | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
11 | PLICHTA Kristin A. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
12 | OU Sochivly | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
13 | STANICA Teodora O. | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.