USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Cadet Women's Saber

Wednesday, July 6, 2022 at 1:00 PM

Minneapolis, MN, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 FREEDMAN Janna N. - - - - 3% 23% 74%
2 MIKA Veronica - - - 1% 11% 40% 47%
3 SHOMAN Jenna - - - - 2% 23% 75%
3 ERIKSON Kira R. - - 4% 19% 39% 31% 7%
5 BEVACQUA Aria F. - - 3% 20% 45% 32%
6 KER Grace - - - 2% 15% 41% 42%
7 DUCKETT Madison - - - 2% 15% 42% 41%
8 MULAGARI Sadhika 4% 20% 38% 29% 9% 1%
9 HILD Nisha - - 1% 5% 21% 41% 33%
10 ANDRES Charmaine G. - - - 2% 14% 41% 43%
11 KIM Marley I. - 1% 6% 26% 46% 22%
12 GHAYALOD Reya - - - 2% 15% 41% 41%
13 BARNOVITZ Maya - - 5% 20% 39% 29% 7%
14 BALAKUMARAN Maya - - 3% 22% 47% 27%
15 CHIN Sophia J. - - 4% 21% 44% 30%
16 TONG Jessie - - 5% 25% 42% 24% 3%
17 ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. - - - - 5% 30% 65%
18 ALCEBAR Kayla - - 2% 11% 32% 39% 16%
19 LIU Sophie - - 2% 10% 27% 39% 23%
20 HWANG Gabriela M. - 1% 6% 24% 42% 27%
21 WIGGERS Susan Q. - - - 3% 16% 40% 41%
22 FANG Victoria W. - - 3% 16% 37% 35% 8%
23 WEI Vivian W. - 1% 6% 22% 38% 28% 6%
24 NATH Trisha - 1% 8% 28% 43% 20%
25 KRASTEV Minna - - 1% 11% 38% 50%
26 SINHA Anika - 5% 22% 38% 28% 6%
27 YUAN Greta - - 4% 17% 34% 32% 12%
28 JOHNSON Lydia - 1% 6% 24% 39% 26% 5%
29 YANG Angelina LeLe - - 2% 13% 36% 38% 11%
30 WU Helen - 2% 11% 27% 35% 21% 4%
31 XIAO julie - 1% 9% 27% 37% 21% 4%
32 SOURIMTO Valeria - 1% 9% 31% 42% 17%
33 VADASZ Ibla P. - - - 3% 18% 42% 37%
34 HU Michelle - 2% 17% 45% 30% 6%
35 LIU Sydney - 2% 17% 40% 32% 9% 1%
36 ANTHONY Alexia B. - - 2% 11% 31% 39% 17%
37 TABANGAY Heartlyn - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6%
38 SHI Julia 1% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4% -
39 LI Amanda C. - - - 1% 8% 36% 55%
40 FEIG Sela - 4% 17% 35% 32% 11% 1%
41 KHAN Alissa - 6% 24% 40% 26% 4%
42 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. - 1% 8% 30% 43% 18%
43 LIM Jaslene 1% 15% 36% 34% 13% 1%
44 CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. 2% 13% 34% 35% 14% 2%
45 LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA - 2% 12% 30% 36% 18% 1%
46 YANG Lea 1% 8% 23% 33% 24% 9% 1%
47 LEE Sophia - 2% 14% 33% 36% 14% 1%
48 LIGH Erenei J. - 1% 5% 20% 39% 30% 6%
49 FERREIRA Alejandra E. - 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4%
50 FESTA Carina 1% 10% 30% 37% 19% 3%
51 SHEARER Natalie E. - - 3% 17% 44% 36%
52 LU Elaine - - 3% 21% 47% 30%
53 JEONG Katie - 2% 14% 35% 36% 12%
54 LEE Hannah - - 2% 14% 41% 42%
55 JIANG Mu Jia (Michelle) 35% 43% 18% 3% - -
56 ZHANG XUANYI - - 5% 19% 37% 30% 8%
57 JOHNSON Dagny L. - 1% 4% 18% 36% 32% 9%
58 HAMBAZAZA Liisa 1% 6% 21% 36% 27% 8% 1%
59 NATHANSON Sammy E. - 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7%
60 LUKER Sophia - 2% 13% 30% 34% 18% 3%
61 TAN Adelyn 18% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
62 TSE Angelina - - 4% 19% 40% 32% 4%
63 ZHANG Victoria 1% 9% 34% 38% 15% 2%
64 SHINCHUK Ellisha 3% 14% 29% 31% 18% 5% 1%
65 CHEN Ashley - - 5% 20% 41% 28% 6%
66 MANSPERGER Leena - 3% 14% 33% 35% 14% 2%
67 HUNG Anna - 4% 18% 38% 32% 8%
68 ZHANG Chenfei 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
69 YANG Ashley M. - - - 3% 17% 43% 36%
70 SHI Cathleen - - 2% 11% 32% 40% 14%
71 YOUNG Charlotte G. 1% 12% 31% 33% 18% 4% -
72 CHIANG Melissa 3% 27% 40% 23% 6% 1% -
73 GAUTAM Sahana 4% 18% 32% 28% 14% 3% -
74 GRAFF Sophie - - 3% 20% 42% 30% 4%
75 WEI JoyAnn 3% 15% 30% 31% 17% 4% -
76 WANG yining - 6% 29% 41% 21% 3%
77 PAUL Lila - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
78 SO Catelyn 1% 8% 28% 39% 21% 4%
79 YOUNG Audrey 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
80 HENRY Soraya S. 3% 20% 38% 29% 9% 1%
81 ZHANG Sophie 1% 11% 32% 36% 17% 3%
82 EVANS Madelynn 8% 32% 38% 18% 3% -
83 TSUI Natalie - 1% 5% 21% 38% 28% 7%
84 COLBY Mercer 6% 26% 37% 23% 6% 1% -
85 DAI Olivia 2% 15% 33% 33% 14% 3% -
86 BAWA Anahat 7% 28% 37% 21% 6% 1% -
86 CHIARELLI Valentina 1% 6% 18% 31% 29% 13% 2%
88 YAM Danika - 3% 15% 31% 33% 16% 3%
89 MEDVINSKY Alexandra 2% 13% 29% 32% 18% 5% -
90 CHANG Audrey - 5% 20% 34% 28% 11% 1%
91 OBRADOVIC Ana - 3% 17% 36% 31% 12% 1%
92 MCKEE Brynnley - 1% 10% 29% 37% 20% 3%
92 DONG Angel - 6% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
94 FAN Grace 2% 12% 28% 33% 19% 5% -
95 SOWERS Lia 8% 31% 37% 19% 4% - -
96 LIN Nicole 4% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1% -
97 ATTIA Jasmine 32% 42% 21% 5% - - -
98 FLATT Sophia 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1% -
99 ALTIRS Kate 7% 28% 38% 21% 4% -
100 NGUYEN Siena 1% 11% 32% 37% 17% 2%
101 LIU Yifei 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
102 CHEN Kevy 6% 28% 39% 22% 5% -
103 DUDNICK Morgan 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% -
104 MUND Ruth 4% 21% 38% 28% 8% 1%
105 SCOTT Eve 3% 28% 47% 19% 3% -
106 REN Xinling 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 2%
107 TUNG Renee 16% 38% 33% 12% 2% -
108 MARYASH Samantha - 4% 18% 34% 31% 12% 1%
109 FANG sophie 2% 19% 39% 29% 10% 2% -
110 CHAN Jolene 3% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
111 KANTIPUDI Shrika 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8% -
112 ZHENG Valentina 2% 15% 33% 32% 15% 3% -
113 LI Victoria 6% 27% 37% 23% 7% 1% -
114 HUAI Delilah 2% 10% 26% 32% 22% 7% 1%
115 GUVEN Coco 6% 24% 37% 25% 7% 1% -
115 DENG Brooke - 5% 22% 36% 26% 9% 1%
117 ZOLLER Noelle 6% 26% 38% 24% 6% 1% -
118 CHAVAN Arya 18% 39% 30% 10% 2% - -
119 HUANG Rachael 1% 10% 28% 35% 20% 5% -
120 NAYAK Esha 1% 12% 32% 35% 16% 3% -
120 HITOMI Nadya 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
122 PANIGRAHI Kingsley - 11% 41% 35% 11% 1% -
123 BOYNTON Ainsley 14% 43% 31% 10% 2% - -
124 GRULICH Rayaana 2% 15% 33% 32% 15% 3% -
125 DHAR Layla 12% 36% 35% 14% 2% -
126 JUNG Irene - < 1% 5% 22% 44% 29%
127 ELNATAN Mica A. 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% -
127 BUHAY Kirsten M. 8% 32% 38% 19% 4% -
129 STONE Coral 13% 35% 33% 15% 3% - -
129 GOLOVITSER Maya 11% 40% 35% 12% 2% - -
131 MONTORIO Lily M. 4% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1% -
132 PYO Penelope E. 18% 38% 31% 11% 2% - -
133 MANN Sophia J. 2% 19% 38% 30% 10% 1%
134 HOLMES Sabrina 38% 46% 14% 2% - -
135 LEUNG Ashlyn K. 11% 34% 36% 16% 3% -
136 BARRIE Sadie Q. 6% 43% 40% 10% 1% -
136 CHO Michelle 13% 36% 35% 14% 2% -
138 KIM Elyssa 69% 27% 4% - - -
139 LEE Lauren 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 3% -
140 BOLTON Eleksi M. 2% 14% 34% 33% 14% 3% -
141 YEN Natalie 2% 15% 36% 33% 13% 2% -
142 RAMIREZ Mirka A. 1% 11% 31% 36% 18% 3% -
143 IYER Arushi 50% 39% 9% 1% - - -
144 GOMERMAN Sophia 3% 17% 32% 30% 14% 3% -
145 XU Emily T. 3% 19% 36% 30% 11% 2% -
146 WUNNAVA Elina 15% 37% 33% 13% 2% - -
146 LAGOON Miriam 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
148 CHOU Amy R. 7% 29% 38% 20% 5% - -
149 CAO Sophie 40% 40% 16% 3% - - -
150 SAWANT Asmi 49% 39% 11% 1% - - -
151 YAO Rainie 31% 42% 21% 5% - - -
152 YAN Lena 14% 34% 32% 16% 4% - -
153 JEFFORDS Sophia 12% 53% 29% 6% - - -
154 GOSAVI Aabolee 43% 41% 14% 2% - - -
155 DANTULURI Shivani 59% 33% 7% 1% - -
156 SHEN Jamie 8% 26% 34% 23% 8% 2% -
157 CARTER Keely 39% 41% 16% 3% - - -
158 DIECK Miranda P. 44% 40% 13% 2% - -
159 MERCHANT Aishwarya 2% 23% 40% 27% 7% 1%
160 LIN Lauren 29% 49% 19% 3% - -
160 KELLY Ella 73% 25% 3% - - -
162 REGANTI Sitara 15% 37% 33% 13% 2% - -
163 ZHANG Emily 49% 38% 12% 2% - - -
163 DANTULURI Shalini 11% 34% 36% 16% 3% - -
163 CHOW Caitlyn 68% 27% 4% - - - -
166 BRAMMER-GONZALES Xiomara 73% 25% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.