Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZUCKER Noah L. | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% | |
2 | ELDARAWANI Yasser M. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 11% |
3 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | - | 2% | 11% | 36% | 42% | 9% | |
3 | LICHTEN Keith H. | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% | |
5 | MAKMATOV Vadim | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
6 | CHENG Thomas | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
7 | ROSTAL Scott E. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% |
8 | MACZIK Adam W. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
9 | SPRINGER Michael | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
10 | ALLEN Graham | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
11 | YAO Shun | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | 1% | |
12 | GERSEN Jacob | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
13 | IORIO Matthew | 18% | 44% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
14 | RHEA Eric L. | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
15 | KIM Jeff | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | - | |
16 | KUO Michael | 34% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
17 | STOCK Jordan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
18 | GAUVEY Ken C. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
19 | HARRELL D. Fox | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
20 | SANTOS Felipe | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
21 | HILLSTROM Nathan | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
22 | LIN Kimball | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | - | |
23 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 1% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
24 | CHIZ Max H. | 7% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
25 | KENT IV David | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
26 | FERRIERE Thomas | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.