Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TEPEDELENLIOGLU Mehmet | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% | |
| 2 | BARREIRO Darren | - | - | 5% | 23% | 46% | 26% | |
| 3 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 3 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
| 5 | GAINES Aaron | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 6 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
| 7 | EMARA Elsayed M. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 41% | 12% |
| 8 | ROOD Alex | - | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | |
| 9 | O'LOUGHLIN Chris S. | - | - | - | - | 8% | 38% | 54% |
| 10 | NORMILE Jon M. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% |
| 11 | EXUM Travis H. | - | - | 3% | 23% | 46% | 26% | 3% |
| 12 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | NIEMIEC Mark | 20% | 45% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 14 | WHEELER Daniel | - | 8% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 2% | |
| 15 | WAY Kashi M. | - | 3% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 3% | |
| 16 | CRANOR Erich L. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% | |
| 17 | NEMAZIE David A. | - | 6% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 4% | |
| 18 | HELGE James R. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% | |
| 18 | KORSCHUN Daniel | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 20 | COETZEE Frans M. | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 21 | BAILEY Creston P. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 2% |
| 22 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 2% | |
| 23 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 24 | DEPOMMIER Remi | - | 1% | 15% | 42% | 32% | 8% | - |
| 25 | BECK Brian C. | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | FRANK Fred | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
| 25 | WILLIAMS Richard | 20% | 51% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 28 | STEWART Robert | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 29 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | ELTERMAN Lev | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 31 | REID Michael | 14% | 51% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | THOMAS Jr. Robert D. | - | 11% | 51% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 33 | DALRYMPLE Sr. Ronald W. | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 34 | DAVIS Andrew | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 21% | 3% | |
| 35 | LOGUE Paul | 14% | 64% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 36 | CLINEFELTER Dennis S. | 1% | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | SCHICKER Glenn | - | 7% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 1% | |
| 38 | SIMS Martin L. | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | DUONG John | 63% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | KRYLTSOV Greg | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | PARK Patrick | 94% | 6% | - | - | - | - | |
| 42 | SCHIAVONE Oreste | 16% | 47% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | KUHN Jeffrey | 51% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | SCHARF David | 77% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.