Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
2 | BERMAN Frauke | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 55% |
3 | ALTMAN Leigh | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 43% | 11% |
3 | DENNER Jasmina | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 35% |
5 | OBLONSKY Natalia | - | 4% | 34% | 45% | 16% | |
6 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 23% |
7 | GLUCK Myriam | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
8 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 3% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 5% | - |
9 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
10 | FOLEY Eileen | - | 1% | 16% | 46% | 36% | |
11 | OISHI Yoko | 37% | 54% | 9% | - | - | |
12 | KNUTSON Theresa S. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
13 | WILLEMSE Jamie | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
14 | WILSON Dawn J. | - | 3% | 32% | 47% | 17% | |
15 | WEBB Maud | 49% | 45% | 6% | - | - | |
16 | WU Yik Chun | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
17 | DREYER Nadia S. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
18 | MUNGOVAN Elizabeth | 8% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - |
19 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | - | 7% | 31% | 43% | 17% | 2% |
20 | JOHNSON Pamela | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
21 | DUDNICK Shannon | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
22 | MARSH Lisa | 48% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
23 | STCLAIREKING Tiffany | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.