Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% |
| 2 | BERMAN Frauke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 3 | ALTMAN Leigh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 11% |
| 3 | DENNER Jasmina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 35% |
| 5 | OBLONSKY Natalia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 61% | 16% | |
| 6 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 23% |
| 7 | GLUCK Myriam | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
| 8 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 9 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 10 | FOLEY Eileen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 36% | |
| 11 | OISHI Yoko | 100% | 63% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 12 | KNUTSON Theresa S. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 13 | WILLEMSE Jamie | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | WILSON Dawn J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 65% | 17% | |
| 15 | WEBB Maud | 100% | 51% | 6% | - | - | |
| 16 | WU Yik Chun | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | DREYER Nadia S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 18 | MUNGOVAN Elizabeth | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 19 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 19% | 2% |
| 20 | JOHNSON Pamela | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 21 | DUDNICK Shannon | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | MARSH Lisa | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | STCLAIREKING Tiffany | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.